Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I came across this poll being discussed on two conservative sites, and the posters there were pissed at how Trump is destroying the real conservative agenda. You can blame the messenger, in this case the nonpartisan American think tank Pew Research, but it doesn't change the message.
Yet, these same so-called "conservatives" had no problems supporting and electing RINOs. What a bunch of hypocrites!
On some issues, yes. On others, no. Why do you ask? If he ran as a democrat and was saying the exact same things he is saying now, he would still get my vote. I'm not one to vote the straight party line, be it D or R, like some do.
Actually no. Senator jacob Howard stated, in reference to the 14th amendment, "this will not, of course, include foreigners, ALIENS, and children of ambassadors...."
LOOK IT UP. Illegals and visa overstayers ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES and their anchor babies are not legit citizens.
Look at the wong kim ark case. He was granted citizenship because his parents were here legally at the time of his birth.
Lol @ this Google constitutional scholar. Even super conservatives like Ted Cruz disagree with your laughable interpretation of the 14th.
Texas was even denied the right to ban illegal immigrant children of an education back in 1983. The SCOTUS rationale mentioned something about these kids being subject to the jurisdiction of the US.
But yeah, babies born on US soil aren't actual citizens. Keep dreaming.
Last edited by RaymondChandlerLives; 04-03-2016 at 06:23 PM..
What about the people who are too stupid to know when to use "too" and not "to?"
The fact is that most illegal immigrants in the U.S. come in through airports and ship ports and just overstay their visas. A wall has no effect on those and the stats say more are leaving the U.S. than coming from Mexico.
Then, the complexity of the wall makes it impractical. It will cost many billions of dollars, take years to build; require the cost of building every seven years in maintenance; will require taking 1,000 miles of private lands away from Americans, etc.
They don't want to hear about the big picture. Trump said that Mexico will pay for the wall.
Just another example of Trump's decline. His poll numbers are plummeting too as his unfavorable rating soars, he's even losing support among white males, his only base of support. Time is about up for the reality show circus clown. I told you all this would happen as we get closer to NOV and people realize this is a serious election and not a reality show. Cant wait till that pathetic fraud is gone.
Actually Trump's poll numbers are up , up and up. Trump went up in Michigan.. and just might take Cruz..
Trump is a runaway train in NY.. the sky is the limit..up up and up..
Yeah, you don't care what a poll says, so even if it is right and goes against your belief, you will still deny it..thats just sad..sad and ignorant..smdh.
Conservatives have no one to blame but themselves for this. They created this "monster" and now they have to deal with it and can't stop it.
Lmao, oh man, that's a good one.
Oh, money and land you say? Hmm, where have I read this before..oh yes yes yes! You mean just like whites did when they took over Texas(Mexico) and killed the Native Americans back in the 17 and 1800s?
Whites? What difference does it make what race any of those Europeans were? Agenda, much? There were no native Americans when this country/continent was discovered. All of our ancestors migrated here from somewhere else. As for killing the "indios" there were atrocities committed on both sides. The descendants of the tribes that settled within our borders are all U.S. citizens today so what's your beef? It certainly doesn't negate our modern day immigration laws.
Six months ago the public was evenly divided on support for a border wall. Six months later, that support has fallen off by a margin of 38% still in favor, but 58% now against.
In a word: Trump. As one pundit put it on Twitter: "It could be that Trump has made the issue so his thing that it basically meant if you're against Trump you're against the wall."
They probably called a lot of illegals and got that response.. after all they have I phones and land line phones too.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
