Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-06-2016, 11:21 AM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,120,263 times
Reputation: 8011

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacove View Post
For the first time in my life, I may have to watch the Republican convention. With popcorn.
You mean you missed the Clint Eastwood - Empty Chair performance in 2012? That was classic. Better than Cats.

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-06-2016, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
28,900 posts, read 30,279,972 times
Reputation: 19141
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
You mean you missed the Clint Eastwood - Empty Chair performance in 2012? That was classic. Better than Cats.

Mick
I remember that.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 11:22 AM
 
3,841 posts, read 1,980,049 times
Reputation: 1906
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
I don't understand what is "disgusting" about this.

The PARTY chooses who the PARTY will support. The PARTY is, and has always been a private organization with money and influence to wield on behalf of whomever the PARTY chooses.
This is exactly why we need more options besides just Democrat or Republican. What about the PEOPLE nominate someone as well that can run against these money, influence, establishment candidates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 11:23 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,448,989 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
I don't understand what is "disgusting" about this.

The PARTY chooses who the PARTY will support. The PARTY is, and has always been a private organization with money and influence to wield on behalf of whomever the PARTY chooses.
Not so fast. They serve the PUBLIC, they need to listen to voters or disband.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 11:24 AM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,720,265 times
Reputation: 12943
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
You mean you missed the Clint Eastwood - Empty Chair performance in 2012? That was classic. Better than Cats.

Mick
I saw it on the late night shows, GIFs, Twitter, etc. Never let it be said that the GOP lacks humor, it's just that, for them, it's not intentional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
28,900 posts, read 30,279,972 times
Reputation: 19141
GOP is using Cruz to stop Trump. Haley/Rubio is what the GOP wants

Just to show you how corrupt it all is....

There were 3 districts in Philly.....Three....mind you, not one district had a Republican vote during Obama's 2nd election.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 11:28 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,167,528 times
Reputation: 28335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
Not so fast. They serve the PUBLIC, they need to listen to voters or disband.
No, they don't "serve" the public. The political parties are private organizations of like minded people banding together to operate as a cohesive group for a common goal. The public has no right to demand a say in who their nominee is, the public does have a right to choose to vote or not vote for that nominee.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 11:30 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,889,770 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisanicole1 View Post
This is exactly why we need more options besides just Democrat or Republican. What about the PEOPLE nominate someone as well that can run against these money, influence, establishment candidates.
The people can nominate someone any time they want.

The fact is that when they nominate someone, they nominate them under some sort of identifiable aegis, so that the voters will know something of what the candidate stands when they are voting. That labeling is a party. Hence, the Green Party, or the Libertarian Party, or the Socialist Party. These labels allow the parties to raise funds, and to organize in states in order to get on the ballots.

You are not going to get "more options" by grousing on an anonymous forum. You have to change the laws in your STATE, to empower third parties.

And you can try to get the 435-cap lifted on the House of Representatives. Which would loosen the control of the two-party system, would give better representation to the people, would make it harder and more expensive for lobbyists and special interest groups to wield influence, and would address the increasing problem of skewed representation and a skewed electoral college (when one state's representatives only represent 750,000 people and another state's representatives represent 1,200,000 people, the Congressional districts are seriously skewed).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 11:35 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,448,989 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
No, they don't "serve" the public. The political parties are private organizations of like minded people banding together to operate as a cohesive group for a common goal. The public has no right to demand a say in who their nominee is, the public does have a right to choose to vote or not vote for that nominee.
Oh stop...What you said is completely wrong. They serve the damn public. Just stop.
Also, if they don't serve the public then the RNC needs to pay ALL GOP salaries, not the tax payer. That's how I know you are full of ****.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2016, 11:39 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,889,770 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
Oh stop...What you said is completely wrong. They serve the damn public. Just stop.
They don't serve the public.

They serve a public function.

But the party's objective is to help the candidates the party supports to win elections.

If a party is split behind multiple candidates, then it's split. It will then LOSE elections until it can find a way for the party to unite.

The rhetoric behind "no compromise" is a stumbling block for a united party. Divided parties LOSE.

And no matter how you might wish to spin it, the party itself is still a PRIVATE organization, able to make up its own rules, and able to control the nomination process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top