NYT admits 5 banks "too big to fail." And endorses the 1 candidate who's certain not to try to do anything about that. (NAFTA, voting)

[mm4]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/14/bu...ss-muster.html

Democrats love their wars against Libya and Syria, and they love that they have banks that are too big to fail. And they love their dynasties.

[WaldoKitty]

There's a reason the NYT has become as irrelevant as the rest of the MSM. This article is one of them.

[WestCobb]

The NYT doesn't "admit" to anything.. it reports the facts as objectively as possible, which I realize puts them at odds with conservatives.

[WaldoKitty]

Originally Posted by WestCobb

The NYT doesn't "admit" to anything.. it reports the facts as objectively as possible, which I realize puts them at odds with conservatives.

A campaign endorsement is never "objective". It's an "opinion" from the editorial staff.

[WestCobb]

Originally Posted by WaldoKitty

A campaign endorsement is never "objective". It's an "opinion" from the editorial staff.

All papers have an editorial page -- that's not the news section. Only rags confuse the two. The NYT is one of the most scrupulous news sources out there. It doesn't.

[Winterfall8324]

The NYT should be shut down

[RunD1987]

Isn't big banks that fell...doing away with the Glass-Steagall act...Nationlizing the Big Banks...Wall St and Auto Bailouts...the support of NAFTA was what caused the economic crisis the US is in?

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by mm4

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/14/bu...ss-muster.html

Democrats love their wars against Libya and Syria, and they love that they have banks that are too big to fail. And they love their dynasties.

Many (D)'s are not voting for Hillary but I guess you don't see any reason to not lump them all in together.

[mightleavenyc]

The NYT is the PR department of the Clintons.

[crone]

After Jason Blair and Judith Miller it is surprising anybody reads it.