Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-10-2016, 08:57 AM
 
Location: United States
12,391 posts, read 7,110,770 times
Reputation: 6135

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tillman7 View Post
Nothing we haven't heard before, try again.


I know, and this is not the first time that Hillary will have indictment documents drawn up, but the DOJ refuses to act.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2016, 08:59 AM
 
Location: On the road
2,798 posts, read 2,680,819 times
Reputation: 3192
The investigation is over. There never was an offense worthy of indictment. Time to move on, folks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:01 AM
 
3,841 posts, read 1,983,858 times
Reputation: 1906
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarsMac View Post
The investigation is over. There never was an offense worthy of indictment. Time to move on, folks.
Can you please clue the FBI in that the investigation is over. Maybe just tell them LarsMac says its over so please stop?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:01 AM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,458,512 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daywalk View Post
Don't people get it by now? It's a criminal investigation but Hillary Clinton is not the target.
lmao..Only ignoramuses think that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:08 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,685,380 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~ View Post
Trump needs to be kept off twitter.
Another call to destroy first amendment rights of free speech and a continuation of the effect of having a president that has no respect for law and order or the duty to defend the Constitution by the oath he took.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:18 AM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,133,373 times
Reputation: 8011
Mr. Trump might be jealous . . . . he can't get anyone from "his party" to endorse him outright. The lukewarm quasi endorsements are more like, "We must stand behind the nominee for the good of our party, however vile and dangerous he might be."

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:24 AM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,299,452 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Another call to destroy first amendment rights of free speech and a continuation of the effect of having a president that has no respect for law and order or the duty to defend the Constitution by the oath he took.
You don't understand what the first amendment is if you think that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,256 posts, read 27,655,778 times
Reputation: 16084
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
Conflict of interest. Case closed
^^^this
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:33 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,685,380 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~ View Post
You don't understand what the first amendment is if you think that.
Twitter is a form of media.
You are entitled to your own opinion.
You are not entitled to your own facts.

I would never go out of my way to make a liberal look ignorant.
They don't need my help at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2016, 09:56 AM
 
2,727 posts, read 2,837,375 times
Reputation: 4113
Was watching CNN, and they were mentioning that classified documents about the drone program in Pakistan were passed through Hillary's private server and email. Then Evan Perez just came out and stated without any type of facts or reasoning that they don't expect any charges to be filed. The news anchor didn't even ask, 'gee, with the FBI actively investigating, what makes you say that?'

News / journalism is not only dead, but the media have been actively trying to influence the news - just see the whole Mike brown thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top