Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump hasn't established a firm lead on Hillary so the WND article is premature. The race is merely tightening. For nearly two months before the 2012 election Romney held a one to two point advantage on Obama. Obama won easily.
Hillary is also way more disliked than Obama was, especially by progressives. Young people tolerated voting for Obama a second time; they just aren't passionate about voting for Hillary for a first. And Trump is Romney on steroids.
Trump hasn't established a firm lead on Hillary so the WND article is premature. The race is merely tightening. For nearly two months before the 2012 election Romney held a one to two point advantage on Obama. Obama won easily.
I never click on a WND article (too partisan for me) - Washington Post & Politico are both saying .....
Hillary should be worried, AND Democrat insiders ARE worried.
Over $200 Million dollars spent for what? Even in the Polls that don't even include new voters that did not vote in 2008 or 2012. ClintonCourt has a problem and they know it.
We all know that the only Poll that counts is Election Day .... But where is the real Enthusiasim?
It's NOT with ClintonCourt.
It is becoming very apparent. Generally, "google" burying anything negative about Hillary and today, page after page spoke of her hateful accusation of half of Trump supporters. I wasn't even finding mention that she had "regretted" saying (only) half of them were "deplorable".
You can see the polls tightening in a way that they can no longer fabricate an advantage for Clinton.
They were keeping her out of the eye of the general public, but after her bump in the polls started to drift away, they pulled her out of moth balls and put her out there. She immediately did more harm than good with her "deplorable" remark.
I am sure they don't have a clue what to do with her now. And, we are still awaiting the "October surprise". Frankly, I don't think I can take hearing anymore about her lies and corruption and the polls are showing I am not the only one.
So, yes, the tide is going out with Hillary in it as in "washed out".
I'm thinking the deplorable remark was her Mitt-moment.
Trump could lose and he would back to his life. Hillary will lose and her life as she conceives it would be catastrophically over.
Or cankles could win, and the country would be catastrophically over.
CN
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
