Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-21-2016, 09:40 AM
 
Location: SE Asia
16,236 posts, read 5,876,904 times
Reputation: 9117

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
You all know....the smear campaign that's been waged against the Clintons. The most investigated couple in history. Countless investigations, and zilch, nada, zip.
They are the most investigated for a very good reason. They are also the most corrupt.
The investigation into the emails determined that laws were broken and that Hillary was careless to the extreme. Did the FBI lie? Now if they don't like being accused of corruption maybe Bill shouldn't have had that secret meeting with Lynch on her plane. If it had been anyone else the press would have gone ballistic that the nations top prosecutor was hanging out with the spouse of someone under investigation.
Bill did do bad things to women, lied about it, tried to cover it up and paid at least 1 of them off. Hillary did smear his accusers.
I can go on but I think that I made my point. The Clintons are dirty. The fact they haven't been prosecuted doesn't make them less so. Corruption in government is nothing new, we just like to pretend that it doesn't happen here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-21-2016, 10:03 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,866,625 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by boneyard1962 View Post
They are the most investigated for a very good reason. They are also the most corrupt.
The investigation into the emails determined that laws were broken and that Hillary was careless to the extreme. Did the FBI lie? Now if they don't like being accused of corruption maybe Bill shouldn't have had that secret meeting with Lynch on her plane. If it had been anyone else the press would have gone ballistic that the nations top prosecutor was hanging out with the spouse of someone under investigation.
Bill did do bad things to women, lied about it, tried to cover it up and paid at least 1 of them off. Hillary did smear his accusers.
I can go on but I think that I made my point. The Clintons are dirty. The fact they haven't been prosecuted doesn't make them less so. Corruption in government is nothing new, we just like to pretend that it doesn't happen here.
How can they be the most corrupt, and yet none of these investigations turn up squat? Are Republicans that inept?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 10:15 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,503,406 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
You all know....the smear campaign that's been waged against the Clintons. The most investigated couple in history. Countless investigations, and zilch, nada, zip.
I guess to you anything short of a criminal indictment = zilch, nada, zip. To some of us, an impeachment of Bill and a finding of [at minimum] Hillary's 'extreme carelessness' in handling sensitive information aren't zilch, nada, zip.

Her pattern of deceit, obfuscation, and secrecy was evident in 1996 re Whitewater:

"There appears to be a four-year pattern of Hillary Clinton avoiding full disclosure, occasionally forgetting places and events that might embarrass her, and revising her story as documents emerge and the knowledge of her questioners deepens."

Washingtonpost.com: Hillary Clinton and the Whitewater Controversy: A Close-Up

She's the same person now as she was 20 years ago, except now she can blame her concussion for the I don't recalls' and forgetting and the complexity of using email for her deception.

I'll skip her 'bimbo eruption' War Room, Travelgate, the Clinton Pay to Play Fraudation, Benghazi, and others, because you're a Hillary lappie through and through.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 10:22 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,866,625 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
I guess to you anything short of a criminal indictment = zilch, nada, zip. To some of us, an impeachment of Bill and a finding of [at minimum] Hillary's 'extreme carelessness' in handling sensitive information aren't zilch, nada, zip.

Her pattern of deceit, obfuscation, and secrecy was evident in 1996 re Whitewater:

"There appears to be a four-year pattern of Hillary Clinton avoiding full disclosure, occasionally forgetting places and events that might embarrass her, and revising her story as documents emerge and the knowledge of her questioners deepens."

Washingtonpost.com: Hillary Clinton and the Whitewater Controversy: A Close-Up

She's the same person now as she was 20 years ago, except now she can blame her concussion for the I don't recalls' and forgetting and the complexity of using email for her deception.

I'll skip her 'bimbo eruption' War Room, Travelgate, the Clinton Pay to Play Fraudation, Benghazi, and others, because you're a Hillary lappie through and through.
When you talk about criminality and corruption, yes, zilch, nada, zip is nothing.

Whitewater was a failed real estate development deal. Starr investigated it thoroughly, and the Clintons didn't do anything wrong.

As for bimbos, I think a wife is entitled to speak disparagingly of the women who committed adultery with her husband.

And I'm not anyone's lappie. You might refrain from personal insults in the future, they don't further your arguments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 10:28 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,558,981 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
It's on her campaign page that she intends to abolish the Constitution?

Or it's your bizarre interpretation of her policies?
I'd like to ask not to argue the semantics.

Is it not Hillary's policy that nobody on the no-fly list should be able to purchase firearm? If yes, is it not throwing away our due process? If we get rid of the due process, how much of the constitution would still be left?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 10:31 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,866,625 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
I'd like to ask not to argue the semantics.

Is it not Hillary's policy that nobody on the no-fly list should be able to purchase firearm? If yes, is it not throwing away our due process? If we get rid of the due process, how much of the constitution would still be left?
Semantics is the card you're playing.

Nowhere on Clinton's website does it say anything about abolishing the Constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 10:32 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
You all know....the smear campaign that's been waged against the Clintons. The most investigated couple in history. Countless investigations, and zilch, nada, zip.
Those poor innocent individuals.. They've never done anything wrong..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 10:37 AM
 
16,551 posts, read 8,592,152 times
Reputation: 19393
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69Charger View Post
This is a very simple question that baffles me. She has so much blood and scandal on her hands, yet is still eligible for the highest office in the land? And people WANT her???
The koolaid drinking brainwashed zombies want her, along with Wall Street, the government dependent, and the establishment career politicians in both parties.
Trump will upset the cozy apple cart they have managed to create.

I am not a Trump fan per se, but rest assured I will vote for him to defeat Hillary.

Heck I'd vote for just about any Democrat over her, whether it was Biden, Mondale, Carter, you name it. Not so much because I'd be ideologically in line with them over the (R) nominee, but because they are not corrupt to the core and wholly dishonest. She clearly is, so there is no way I'd vote for her, even over a socialist like Bernie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 10:40 AM
 
Location: SE Asia
16,236 posts, read 5,876,904 times
Reputation: 9117
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
How can they be the most corrupt, and yet none of these investigations turn up squat? Are Republicans that inept?
No the system is and just because they haven't been indicted doesn't make it less true. Al Capone was a well know murderer and yet he went to prison for tax violations, they never pinned a murder on him.
My opinion is the system is corrupt.
They did turn up violations but choose not to charge Hillary. That said, both Clintons are lawyers. I would hope that they would be able to manipulate the law in their favor and avoid prosecution. The phrase "I don't recall" is a well known trick used to avoid perjury. Hillary used it 20 odd times to avoid answering damning questions.
Hey you can worship at the alter of the Clintons. That is your right, just don't expect everyone to join the religion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,944,326 times
Reputation: 5661
Thread Title: "How can Hillary do so many illegal things, and still be in this election?"

People throw around the word "illegal," "crime," and "criminal" loosely. The fact is that to call someone a criminal, one must have been CONVICTED of a crime. Mrs. Clinton has not been convicted of anything and therefore, any claim of illegality is pure speculation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top