Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-20-2016, 03:03 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,913,446 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nc99 View Post
I am just troubled by the exact same thought....So, In the Primary, there are people who just voted cause her name was Hillary, they like Bill Clinton and they voted another Clinton, there are lots of people who have the same mindset as hers, "win by hook or crook" and they vote for her...only those people who are honest and true to their heart voted for Bernie and are very much troubled like your question! SAD! Is there no one better than these two in this Great Country!
What tripe.

People who are honest and true to their heart voted for each of the candidates.

People have different opinions, different perspectives and different priorities. The people who disagree with you are not less moral, or less intelligent, or less informed. They simply see things differently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-20-2016, 03:08 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,913,446 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
Awesome. Thank you.

At no point did Powell give Clinton advice about a server.

At no point did ANY other SOS give Clinton advice about a server.

Powell DID give Clinton advice about emails, according to Conason: "Powell told her to use her own email, as he had done, except for classified communications, which he had sent and received via a State Department computer."

Powell had has "no recollection" of the conversation described in Conason's book.

So ONE SOS gave her advice about emails, which she blatantly ignored. ONE SOS gave her advice about emails, not a server. The SOS says that conversation never happened.

Yup, Clinton decided on her own to get a server, got caught, dumped incriminating evidence from that server, and put the country in jeopardy due to her inability to understand computers or her willingness to break the law because she believes she's above it.

Got it.....
We didn't have a series of investigations to see if Powell ever received or transmitted classified communication through his personal e-mail account, the one on AOL.

Democrats didn't set up investigations of Condaleeza Rice, and hold hearing after hearing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2016, 03:09 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,913,446 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
You truly have a reading comprehension problem, don't you.

The law doesn't require that the classified information be obtained by foreign actors for the law to be broken.
No, I comprehend fine.

I comprehend that you don't have an adequate rebuttal, so you decide to go the route of personal insult.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2016, 05:07 PM
 
Location: SoCal & Mid-TN
2,325 posts, read 2,654,773 times
Reputation: 2874
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
You all know....the smear campaign that's been waged against the Clintons. The most investigated couple in history. Countless investigations, and zilch, nada, zip.
^^This. It's like the boy who cried wolf. It's been going on for so long with zero results that any claims have lost any sense of credibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 04:41 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,083 posts, read 44,917,204 times
Reputation: 13726
Well... You can't fix stupid. Too many people are willing to remain ignorant on how egregiously careless Hillary and her staff/contractors were on this. And if they're millennials, here's why...
Quote:
"This exam, given in 23 countries, assessed the thinking abilities and workplace skills of adults. It focused on literacy, math and technological problem-solving. The goal was to figure out how prepared people are to work in a complex, modern society.

And U.S. millennials performed horribly...

But surely America’s brightest were on top?

Nope. U.S. millennials with master’s degrees and doctorates did better than their peers in only three countries, Ireland, Poland and Spain...

The ETS study noted that a decade ago the skill level of American adults was judged mediocre. “Now it is below even that.†So Millennials are falling even further behind."
U.S. millennials post 'abysmal' scores in tech, thinking ability, and worplace skills test, lag behind foreign peers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...foreign-peers/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 07:40 AM
 
1,640 posts, read 796,520 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Well... You can't fix stupid. Too many people are willing to remain ignorant on how egregiously careless Hillary and her staff/contractors were on this. And if they're millennials, here's why...
U.S. millennials post 'abysmal' scores in tech, thinking ability, and worplace skills test, lag behind foreign peers
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...foreign-peers/
Not surprising at all. All 6 Nobel laureates from the US in 2016 are immigrants. We are a nation of people that do not value education, are anti-science/anti-intellectual, and pro-conspiracy theory. Hence the Trump phenomenon. We are the laughing stock of the western world.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_iCyWkVGUM
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 08:34 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,586,913 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassy Fae View Post
Not surprising at all. All 6 Nobel laureates from the US in 2016 are immigrants. We are a nation of people that do not value education, are anti-science/anti-intellectual, and pro-conspiracy theory. Hence the Trump phenomenon. We are the laughing stock of the western world.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_iCyWkVGUM
Trump phenomenon? Which part of Hillary policy is scientific and intellectual?

Let me count:
1. Raising taxes to create jobs.
2. Importing massive poverty to enrich Americans
3. Abolishing the constitution to protect freedom and liberty
4. Advocating mob rule instead of rule of law
5. Institutionalizing racism to fight racism
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 08:55 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,586,913 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverikv View Post
I can make up policies and then say they are bad too. That Trump policy of executing everyones first born son is a non starter.

I'll even add this stupid emoji for effect
Can we be honest here? Which policy did I make up? Hillary said those herself and they are on her campaign page. Trump never said or punished that he wanted to execute anybody. Just so you know, I am not into the liberal word game arguing semantics such as tomato is not tomato.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 09:30 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,913,446 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Can we be honest here? Which policy did I make up? Hillary said those herself and they are on her campaign page. Trump never said or punished that he wanted to execute anybody. Just so you know, I am not into the liberal word game arguing semantics such as tomato is not tomato.
It's on her campaign page that she intends to abolish the Constitution?

Or it's your bizarre interpretation of her policies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2016, 09:33 AM
 
Location: University City, Philadelphia
22,632 posts, read 14,958,241 times
Reputation: 15935
Quote:
Originally Posted by kat in aiken View Post
HOw can trump be in court battles for all the illegal things he's done and still be in this election? Baffling, isn't it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeIsGood01 View Post
Trump is an admitted sexual predator, how can anyone with a sister, mother or daughter vote for him.
Only one presidential candidate has a court date before a Federal judge this year of 2016:

His name is Donald Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top