Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-19-2016, 08:33 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lunetunelover View Post
She did not compromise national security.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-19-2016, 08:35 AM
 
Location: Paradise
4,876 posts, read 4,200,286 times
Reputation: 7715
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
She did not compromise national security.
You can believe what you want. IMO the facts say otherwise. Either way, it's obvious she could come out and tell the world that she did and many people still wouldn't believe it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 08:36 AM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,551,388 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
I still have yet to see anything that Hillary has done that was illegal or crooked or even mean....
That's because there isn't anything. That won't stop the sad cons from desperately scrabbling for something, ANYTHING that tries to prove they're right. And yet, they come up empty handed time & time again. They're so pathetic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 08:41 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,861,612 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by lunetunelover View Post
You can believe what you want. IMO the facts say otherwise. Either way, it's obvious she could come out and tell the world that she did and many people still wouldn't believe it.
YOUR opinion is just bias.

She didn't send emails to anyone who wasn't supposed to receive them. The FBI's investigation was very thorough. And she didn't compromise national security. That's what the FACTS say. That's what the FBI reported.

Setting up her own private server was a mistake. She shouldn't have done that. But she did NOT compromise national security.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 08:42 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,521,957 times
Reputation: 24780
Cool How can Hillary do so many illegal things, and still be in this election?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69Charger View Post
This is a very simple question that baffles me.
Let me clear it all up for you.

It's all very straightforward, really. She's been investigated, reinvestigated, and then investigated again for 23 years now, all based on political allegations. In all those years of investigations, there's never been one single charge filed against her.

None.

Zero.

But hyperpartisans will listen to their hate radio/Fox News controllers and keep insisting she's "guilty as hell" because it's so much easier to just keep barking than it is to look critically at your party and conclude that they've been witch hunters for so many years.

So, all those "illegal things" you mentioned?

Bogus.


Quote:
She has so much blood and scandal on her hands, yet is still eligible for the highest office in the land? And people WANT her???
People want her to defeat Drumpf.

And she will.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 08:43 AM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,967,439 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Everything was returned or paid for. So "ransacked and stole" is hyperbole.
No, it was stolen. The fact that it was found out AFTER THE FACT, and the Clintons were forced to make it right, doesn't matter. If they hadn't been caught, it never would have been returned or paid for. If a thief makes off with your car, but is later caught and the car returned, do they get a pass? No.

Why do you condone REPEATED theft of the American taxpayer by the Clintons?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 08:45 AM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,967,439 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
There re experts in the futures market that can see an opportunity to make a quick buck. And that's what happened.

As far as Whitewater, it was a failed real estate development deal. Period.
Then why did the Clinton cohorts end up going to jail?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 08:47 AM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,967,439 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
The above is just crap. The Clinton foundation spent most of the donations on operational activities of the charitable programs they were running. Yes, they didn't tend to give it to other charities that were proving direct aid; again they did it themselves.

Most of the money was not spent on "administration, travel, and salaries and bonuse". Most of the money was spent on the charitable operational activities that the foundation was supporting.
So what exactly ARE operational activities? Oh wait, they're administration, travel salaries and bonuses. I get it now - it depends on what the definition of "is" is, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 08:50 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
No, it was stolen. The fact that it was found out AFTER THE FACT, and the Clintons were forced to make it right, doesn't matter. If they hadn't been caught, it never would have been returned or paid for. If a thief makes off with your car, but is later caught and the car returned, do they get a pass? No.
Good point.

I had my car stolen from a parking garage in Chicago that required that one leave one's keys with the attendant. My car was stolen, returned with damage, and the attendant and his accomplices were charged for and convicted of auto theft.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 08:50 AM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,111,606 times
Reputation: 8011
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Did Petraeus intent to compromise national security?
Listen to what Comey said on that.

Petraeus knowingly provided his notebook with classified information to Mrs. Forehead -- he actually intended to provide the notebook even though he knew for sure that it contained classified information.

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top