Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
but states like PA, NY..trump won 75% of the state.
in BLUE NY, trump won 75% of the state.... what gave him a loss in new York State is NYC
New York....out of 62 counties... Hillary won only 16..... trump took 46 counties.
of the 5 boroughs of NYC..Hillary lost Staten Island, she could not even carry the whole city
if the liberals keep showing that illegals mean more than actual citizens, and that benefits for illegals mean more than a solid middleclass... they are going to lose more votes than they think they are gaining
liberals keep forgetting about the workingclass/middleclass
And if conservatives think that independents are going to vote for the vileness of the way this president has been acting a second time, they are going to be sorely mistaken.
It always cracks me up when conservatives tout how much empty land is red. It's as if they think empty acres have more voting rights than actual citizens. With that kind of thinking, they display lots of empty space between the ears.
It always cracks me up when conservatives tout how much empty land is red. It's as if they think empty acres have more voting rights than actual citizens. With that kind of thinking, they display lots of empty space between the ears.
right... because 75 people crammed into a 10000sf(1/4 acre) apartment building are MORE IMPORTANT than 10 people on 20 acres, providing you food...…
thanks for acknowledging how the liberal elites feel they mean more than the serfs that serve them
Last edited by workingclasshero; 06-22-2018 at 02:53 PM..
right... because 75 people crammed into a 10000sf(1/4 acre) apartment building are MORE IMPORTANT than 10 people on 20 acres, providing you food...…
thanks for acknowledging how the liberal elites feel they mean more than the serfs that serve them
What an odd argument.
It really sounds to me as if you would prefer it if the vote of one person counted more than the votes of five or ten or twenty (or more) people.
It has nothing to do with importance and everything to do with equal representation.
Let’s apply this logic to the mid-terms.
Every single local race this year will be decided by a majority of voters choosing one candidate over another.
Is that not valid?
Or should the vote of a single person who lives in a single family house in a particular district count more than the votes of the people who live in the condo complex down the street?
right... because 75 people crammed into a 10000sf(1/4 acre) apartment building are MORE IMPORTANT than 10 people on 20 acres, providing you food...…
thanks for acknowledging how the liberal elites feel they mean more than the serfs that serve them
Speaking of elites, your own view is that of an aristocratic elite: You believe that people who own more land should have greater power. As I just said above, this would have been a popular view in the 14th Century.
You don't get it: 75 people crammed into an apartment have the SAME rights as 75 people spread out over a square mile.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
