Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Heard of him before but haven't been paying much attention to potential candidates just waiting on the next election cycle.
I do think he is in the direction he Dems need and those who have commented thus far are not Democrats and so you cannot speak on their leans. I'm also not a Democrat but don't have some sort of red/negative view of them and do feel that this guy is representative of a lot of what is going on in the Democratic party today.
ETA: I especially like that he is a veteran. IMO it is a good idea for a potential and actual president to have some military experience due to him/her not being as apt to send our country's soldiers into harm's way for an unnecessary reason without intimately knowing the risks.
Heard of him before but haven't been paying much attention to potential candidates just waiting on the next election cycle.
I do think he is in the direction he Dems need and those who have commented thus far are not Democrats and so you cannot speak on their leans. I'm also not a Democrat but don't have some sort of red/negative view of them and do feel that this guy is representative of a lot of what is going on in the Democratic party today.
ETA: I especially like that he is a veteran. IMO it is a good idea for a potential and actual president to have some military experience due to him/her not being as apt to send our country's soldiers into harm's way for an unnecessary reason without intimately knowing the risks.
I like the fact that he's young and a veteran and appears to speak his mind.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 26 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,556,695 times
Reputation: 6044
Seth Moulton is a Decent candidate , but thats about it.
The article is based on the premise that Moulton carried his district because he is a moderate and the Current(at the time) dem was more liberal.
Thats a lie in and of itself. Tierney had held the District since 1997 and routinely gotten around 70% of the vote.
Being liberal wasnt the problem,Being "liberal" was as the Republican ran to the left of him. All Seth Moulton did was publicly state his opinion which lined up directly with Tierney.
That's a long article with virtually zero on his policy positions.
Its how corporate media likes it. Dont focus on the issues. Dont focus on who their big donors are. Focus on personality, life stories, anything other than what matters.
The more socialists running, the better. They'd lose handily.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
