Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-27-2020, 05:29 PM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,475 posts, read 11,631,901 times
Reputation: 11995

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minethatbird View Post
A session is needed to legislate, not to select electors. A majority of each house is needed to convene and select electors. This is a direct authority from the the U.S. Constitution and is not bound by state Constitution or state or federal law. Electors currently certified can be decertified by a state legislature and a different slate installed as certified. This must be done by December 8, it does not involve any court or any governor.

The power is not limited to "in session" or "out of session" or "if called by governor". It is a direct power given by the U.S. Constitution only to state legislatures and only regarding selection of electors for President and Vice President.
I think that every time you repeat this horribly inaccurate interpretation of the Constitution, one of the Founders’ angels loses their wings.

Legislatures cannot unilaterally act to change rules after an election. Sorry.

Last edited by SkyDog77; 11-27-2020 at 06:43 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2020, 05:29 PM
 
25,450 posts, read 9,891,664 times
Reputation: 15360
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyDog77 View Post
I think that every time you repeat this horribly inaccurate interpretation of the Constitution, one of the Founders angels loses their wings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 05:30 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,255 posts, read 87,669,059 times
Reputation: 55570
If this is so I need to start digging the bunker now they already burned and looted my town in june
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 05:35 PM
 
3,681 posts, read 1,639,149 times
Reputation: 5111
State legislatures write the law in their state. Not the gov, state officials, or the court. As long as it's constitutional.



Voiding an election because it was tainted is absolutely in their power to do so. They could authorize another election. They could void state income tax if they wanted to. They could tax alcohol 100%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 05:39 PM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,475 posts, read 11,631,901 times
Reputation: 11995
Quote:
Originally Posted by james112 View Post
State legislatures write the law in their state. Not the gov, state officials, or the court. As long as it's constitutional.



Voiding an election because it was tainted is absolutely in their power to do so. They could authorize another election. They could void state income tax if they wanted to. They could tax alcohol 100%.
Please cite the section of the US Constitution that you are referencing that would allow this, along with any relevant precedent. Remember, this is a Federal election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 05:41 PM
 
25,450 posts, read 9,891,664 times
Reputation: 15360
Quote:
Originally Posted by james112 View Post
State legislatures write the law in their state. Not the gov, state officials, or the court. As long as it's constitutional.



Voiding an election because it was tainted is absolutely in their power to do so. They could authorize another election. They could void state income tax if they wanted to. They could tax alcohol 100%.
It ain't tainted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 05:51 PM
 
Location: Franklin, TN
6,662 posts, read 13,387,512 times
Reputation: 7616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
Trump devotees can’t discern the difference between a legal case presented in court and a campaign event by Rudy designed to keep their hopes alive for the purpose of continued fund raising.

It’s all about the grift. It’s always been about the grift.
It would be comical if it wasn't so sad.

I think the ultimate irony of this is that so many of these Trumpers are self proclaimed Constitution-loving patriots -- yet, like their messiah, they lack basic knowledge of how government works, how elections work, and how the court system works...and they seem to be willing to burn the entire system down in the most unpatriotic, unconstitutional way because they can't take an L.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 05:52 PM
 
Location: FL
20,700 posts, read 12,589,736 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minethatbird View Post
The Mockingbird feature of Hammer requires the majority of a controlled population to respect only hammer selected authorities.

Regardless the Pennsylvania Legislature will meet on Monday, and will decide if it wishes to change the electors, if it does, the only limit is the electors be selected by December 8, 2020. A resolution declaring the election in doubt, and the certification in doubt, then directing certification of electors as directed is within each state legislature's power. Decertification by the state legislature is more appropriate than by a court as each state legislature is given sole authority over elector selection. It is also binding. The legislature isn't bound to allow a fraudulent election to stand. The evidence of fraud is overwhelming. A fraudulent election is not binding on electors a state legislature will send to Congress.
Just because Trump says it, doesn't make it true. Read some of the failed court cases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 06:01 PM
 
Location: 0.83 Atmospheres
11,475 posts, read 11,631,901 times
Reputation: 11995
Quote:
Originally Posted by nashvols View Post
It would be comical if it wasn't so sad.

I think the ultimate irony of this is that so many of these Trumpers are self proclaimed Constitution-loving patriots -- yet, like their messiah, they lack basic knowledge of how government works, how elections work, and how the court system works...and they seem to be willing to burn the entire system down in the most unpatriotic, unconstitutional way because they can't take an L.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2020, 06:04 PM
 
Location: King County, WA
15,995 posts, read 6,689,488 times
Reputation: 13520
Special shenanigans.

Pennsylvania Republican Lawmakers Introduce Resolution Disputing 2020 Election Results

Quote:
Lt. Gov. John Fetterman told KDKA last week that if the votes are not certified in Pennsylvania by Monday, Nov. 30, there will be no members of the state House and half the state Senate will not be in office as that is when their terms expire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top