Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Joe Biden of course. The Democrats would be fools to not nominate the man who got the most votes in U.S. history.
I am sure that is tongue in cheek humor.
Biden, of course, probably received under 50 million actual votes. In addition, his dementia will progress and will be grossly evident to even liberals. In addition, he is only more popular than giggles. So they can't run Joe; Obama won't get his fourth term.
Giggles is hated by essentially everyone, so they can't run her either.
So again.................... the other "usual suspects" are all stark raving loonies and the electorate has shown in the recent elections that they are not buying the liberal lunacy anymore.
Tulsi Gabbard is sane, but the dems hate her because she is sane. So it is a quandry. I'm sure they are looking at that now and trying to devise a new form of fraud, as the methods used in 2020 will be difficult to employ a second time.
Biden, of course, probably received under 50 million actual votes. In addition, his dementia will progress and will be grossly evident to even liberals. In addition, he is only more popular than giggles. So they can't run Joe; Obama won't get his fourth term.
Giggles is hated by essentially everyone, so they can't run her either.
So again.................... the other "usual suspects" are all stark raving loonies and the electorate has shown in the recent elections that they are not buying the liberal lunacy anymore.
Tulsi Gabbard is sane, but the dems hate her because she is sane. So it is a quandry. I'm sure they are looking at that now and trying to devise a new form of fraud, as the methods used in 2020 will be difficult to employ a second time.
If Democrats do not nominate Joe Biden as their Presidential candidate in 2024, they will be admitting that the 2020 Presidential election was fraudulent.
Isn't that sad? For the most part, I find her wonderful!
But, because she does not embrace the far left party line and questions idiocy like "wokism", CRT, and open borders, she does not satisfy the democrat "litmus test" for party acceptability.
As stated before, you must embrace lunatic ideas to be a democrat nominee. Sane people need not apply.
But, because she does not embrace the far left party line and questions idiocy like "wokism", CRT, and open borders, she does not satisfy the democrat "litmus test" for party acceptability.
As stated before, you must embrace lunatic ideas to be a democrat nominee. Sane people need not apply.
I still like Steve Bullock, but I'm not sure he's make another swing at it given how little traction he got in 2020. Gina Raimondo maybe?
My preference would actually be for a moderate Republican but the ones I am thinking of (like our current Governor, Charlie Baker) tend to be labelled RINOs by the Trump wing.
Dems have no choice but to back Kamala if she wants to run. To do otherwise would be considered racist by African Americans and they would stay home.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
