Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-19-2022, 12:10 AM
exm
 
3,723 posts, read 1,781,830 times
Reputation: 2849

Advertisements

I think the situation is simple: Liz voted for impeachment and it should have ended there. Instead she legitimized a Nancy Pelosi circus. And while serving on this commission she had zero interest in asking some serious questions like asking the Secret Service agents about the incident in the limo. Instead she took selfies with Pelosi, Schiff and other frauds. So yes, she doesn’t represent her constituents in Wisconsin and got voted out. Good riddance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-19-2022, 07:03 AM
 
Location: 49th parallel
4,608 posts, read 3,302,957 times
Reputation: 9593
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanJuanStar View Post


Will Democrats and the establishment give all the billions back for campaign finance reform. Your party takes a lot of money. That is trying to buy an election?
Former President Donald Trump spent 2021 stockpiling $122 million in campaign cash while contributing just $350,000 to Republican efforts to recapture Congress in midterm elections.

Seems like he's doing something similar, only for himself instead of for party causes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2022, 07:48 AM
 
21,430 posts, read 7,459,324 times
Reputation: 13233
Quote:
Originally Posted by exm View Post
I think the situation is simple: Liz voted for impeachment and it should have ended there. Instead she legitimized a Nancy Pelosi circus. ...
All of the testimony is under oath.

All of the critics, like you for example, are not under oath. Go ahead, name a critic, any critic of the 1/6 panel ... Bannon, Giuliani, Stone, Ingraham, Doocey, Hannity, Trump whomever who has made testimony under oath, under penalty of perjury. They are afraid to. They lie in public to you but under oath they say nothing.

Nearly all, if not all, of the sworn testimony is from Republicans, many of sufficient standing in the party to get sponsored and endorsed into a coveted job in the white house under a Republican president. It is literally a Republican show.

If it is a circus it is a Republican circus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2022, 09:51 AM
 
Location: 49th parallel
4,608 posts, read 3,302,957 times
Reputation: 9593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
All of the testimony is under oath.

All of the critics, like you for example, are not under oath. Go ahead, name a critic, any critic of the 1/6 panel ... Bannon, Giuliani, Stone, Ingraham, Doocey, Hannity, Trump whomever who has made testimony under oath, under penalty of perjury. They are afraid to. They lie in public to you but under oath they say nothing.

Nearly all, if not all, of the sworn testimony is from Republicans, many of sufficient standing in the party to get sponsored and endorsed into a coveted job in the white house under a Republican president. It is literally a Republican show.

If it is a circus it is a Republican circus.
Your statement above is correct except for one thing: Your sentence:

Nearly all, if not all, of the sworn testimony is from Republicans, many of sufficient standing in the party to get sponsored and endorsed into a coveted job in the white house under a Republican president.


should have been bolded. Therefore, I've corrected it for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2022, 05:10 AM
exm
 
3,723 posts, read 1,781,830 times
Reputation: 2849
Quote:
Originally Posted by ndcairngorm View Post
Your statement above is correct except for one thing: Your sentence:

Nearly all, if not all, of the sworn testimony is from Republicans, many of sufficient standing in the party to get sponsored and endorsed into a coveted job in the white house under a Republican president.


should have been bolded. Therefore, I've corrected it for you.
How is that an argument if the only people subpoenaed are indeed Republicans? Maybe we should have put some Democrats under oath like Nancy Pelosi and her staff?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2022, 06:53 AM
 
Location: 49th parallel
4,608 posts, read 3,302,957 times
Reputation: 9593
Quote:
Originally Posted by exm View Post
How is that an argument if the only people subpoenaed are indeed Republicans? Maybe we should have put some Democrats under oath like Nancy Pelosi and her staff?
Well, the people in the White House and other jobs close to the President are all Republicans. Most of the people Trump hired are of his political persuasion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2022, 12:49 AM
 
Location: Arizona
13,278 posts, read 7,316,697 times
Reputation: 10103
Didn't catch this primary debate I thought it was a SNL skit what a bunch of nut jobs.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2022, 01:16 AM
 
33,316 posts, read 12,534,999 times
Reputation: 14946
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilkHammer View Post
This thread is riddled with TDS from the leftoids. They just cannot comprehend this is about far more than the Bad ORANGE Man. We are SICK TO DEATH of the swamp people who have siphoned away the American way of life for their own greed and power.

MAGA now has a life of its own. Sure, President Trump initiated it but it's now an independent movement. We want these fascist Democrats removed and we want their do-nothing money hungry Republican counterparts removed. Liz Cheney was one of those.

PS: 4-3-2-1 until Smersh comes along to tell us that TDS isn't a real thing.
It isn’t a real thing.

It cracks me up though that I’m that much inside your head.

You sound bitter and unable to fend for yourself to the level that you desire.

If you were, then you wouldn’t be bothered by what anyone else achieved, Democrats nor anyone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2022, 09:27 AM
 
Location: 49th parallel
4,608 posts, read 3,302,957 times
Reputation: 9593
Quote:
Originally Posted by CityDreamin View Post
Unlike Obama, Trump left office with a lower net worth than before entering. Your post is nonsense and typical neocon spin on truth.



Wow, I’m impressed! Establishment criminals who used the government to enrich themselves made sworn testimonies? Oh boy, they surely aren’t lying like they did with weapons of mass destruction, RussiaHoax and other boondoggles these wonderful upstanding party members are known for.

The fact you think establishment criminals have any shred of dignity or truth is quite disturbing.

Any mass murderer family like the Cheney’s should be looked at with utter contempt and disgust, not as hero’s as you perceive them to be. You didn’t correct anybody but pouting your feet pretending establishment hacks are upstanding citizens, which says more about you than the person you replied to.
You are the one who called them establishment criminals. Not me. I called them Republicans who worked inside the White House. Most of them were honest people who were just trying to do their jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2022, 09:38 AM
 
8,312 posts, read 3,930,579 times
Reputation: 10651
Sounds like Liz Cheney isn't ruling out a run as an Independent. She could very well siphon off votes from Trump or DeSantis by doing that.

https://www.wfmz.com/news/trump-foe-...e3e123fe4.html

This is coming, and you have to wonder what the "Republican" strategy will be to keep her from being an effective spoiler. They know for certain they aren't going to be able to intimidate her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top