Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-09-2008, 03:09 PM
 
Location: Albemarle, NC
7,730 posts, read 14,161,213 times
Reputation: 1520

Advertisements

Obama says he would impose oil windfall profits tax | Reuters

Quote:
"I'll make oil companies like Exxon pay a tax on their windfall profits, and we'll use the money to help families pay for their skyrocketing energy costs and other bills," the Illinois senator said.
First, the President doesn't create legislation or levy taxes. Only Congress is allowed to do that. As a Constitutional law scholar, Obama should know this.

Second, any tax levied against the oil companies will be passed on to the consumer. How does that help us? All it does is make people more dependent on the government for assistance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-09-2008, 03:12 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,050,316 times
Reputation: 14434
He needs to give up on this one. Will he be able to tax oil companies that are not domestic?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2008, 03:15 PM
 
2,153 posts, read 5,539,384 times
Reputation: 655
The problem is that MOST PEOPLE WILL THINK THIS IS A GREAT MOVE!!! He is clearly playing politics for votes as no sane person (how many of those are in Washington or the USA is up in the air) would think this is a good thing. It's unfortunate we have many many people who won't understand the costs of this move.

Please do not let this man into power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2008, 03:16 PM
 
454 posts, read 749,020 times
Reputation: 102
This is such a bad decision, again, he demonstrates his lack of understanding in basic economics.

The demand for gas is inelastic, so any tax on oil companies would be shifted to consumers, which will end up hurting consumers more.

Change we can't afford.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2008, 03:20 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,224,933 times
Reputation: 7373
It is the type of message that plays out well in the public as a "sound bite". However, the taxation for overseas activities is difficult, especially when large companies have foreign subsidiary organizations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2008, 03:21 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,164,267 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by paperhouse View Post
Obama says he would impose oil windfall profits tax | Reuters



First, the President doesn't create legislation or levy taxes. Only Congress is allowed to do that. As a Constitutional law scholar, Obama should know this.

Second, any tax levied against the oil companies will be passed on to the consumer. How does that help us? All it does is make people more dependent on the government for assistance.
I dont know anything about XOM and their taxes but this article from Feb. and the comments after it are interesting.

Exxon's 2007 Tax Bill: $30 Billion - Seeking Alpha
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2008, 03:22 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,337,717 times
Reputation: 7627
FYI - McCain has also said he would consider a windfall profits tax:


YouTube - McCain on Windfall Profits

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2008, 03:22 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,050,316 times
Reputation: 14434
He is playing on words. He is not saying tax oil company profits he is saying windfall profits which would have to be defined as excessive and without merit based on inputs.

An unexpected profit from a business or other source. The term connotes gaining huge profits without working for them — for example, when oil companies profit from a temporary scarcity of oil.

Clearly with the high cost of finding and producing the product along with the current equilibrium in supply and demand they are not windfall profits but normal market conditions. Thus he really isn't calling for taxes in the current envioronment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top