Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-25-2008, 11:31 AM
 
351 posts, read 338,325 times
Reputation: 60

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Habsburg View Post
Re-read the OP:

The Obama campaign thought that they could go, leave the press corps on the tarmac, and then take off with military escort and make this one last visit. As he did in Iraq, by the way. He visited a casualty unit in the Green Zone, without photographers, as part of the congressional delegation. But the military said that the rules are that he could only go as part of a previously-arranged congressional delegation, to Ramstein.
He could go as a Senator without his campaign staff. So what is your point? I don't need to re-read the OP the fact still remains he made a choice not to go. He knew the DOD rules as he has gone to bases before in this case it would not be the photo op he wanted so he snubbed the wounded soilders to go shopping in Berlin instead. Pathetic, worthless, vile all come to mind when I think of young men and women fighting for our freedom, the freedom for Michelle Obama to say how she is not proud of America, to be snubbed by such an arrogant waste as Barack Hussein Obama. He could have gone and chose not to! He could not take his paid for photo crew or campaign while at the base but he could go as a US Senator and chose not to not. Disgusting!

Last edited by hal512; 07-25-2008 at 11:45 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-25-2008, 11:42 AM
 
5,110 posts, read 7,156,751 times
Reputation: 3116
Quote:
He could go as a Senator without his campaign staff. So what is your point? I don't need to re-read the OP the fact still remains he made a choice not to go.
No you do you need to read as you continue to make an ass of yourself. The only thing that is disgusting is your willful ignorance of these matters.

The Pentagon deemed his trip political - period. It was THEIR choice, not Obama's to prohibit the visit.

I can't wait to hear who from the Pentagon is responsible for the ridiculous action.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2008, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
1,113 posts, read 1,818,838 times
Reputation: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by hal512 View Post
He could go as a Senator without his campaign staff. So what is your point? I don't need to re-read the OP the fact still remains he made a choice not to go. He could have gone and chose not to! He could not take his paid for photo crew or campaign while at the base but he could go as a US Senator and chose not to not. Disgusting!
Ok let's cut down the quotation even more for you:

"previously-arranged congressional delegation"

As in, they said he couldn't just ditch his staff and the press and visit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2008, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Washington, DC
540 posts, read 964,486 times
Reputation: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeP View Post
No you do you need to read as you continue to make an ass of yourself. The only thing that is disgusting is your willful ignorance of these matters.

The Pentagon deemed his trip political - period. It was THEIR choice, not Obama's to prohibit the visit.

I can't wait to hear who from the Pentagon is responsible for the ridiculous action.

The willful ignorance seems to be coming from you. The Obama campaign said that they cancelled the trip themselves. They were told that Obama could visit, but not with his campaign entourage. Read some more recent reports instead of just going with what Andrea Mitchell "heard" earlier on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2008, 11:49 AM
 
5,110 posts, read 7,156,751 times
Reputation: 3116
No, the Pentagon rejected him coming because of the basis of his trip - he could not ditch his staff and still go, according to them.

Again, I can't wait to hear who the idiot at the Pentagon is who is responsible for this ridiculous decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2008, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Washington, DC
540 posts, read 964,486 times
Reputation: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by trzlucky View Post
``The senator decided out of respect for these servicemen and women that it would be inappropriate to make a stop to visit troops at a U.S. military facility as part of a trip funded by the campaign,'' spokesman Robert Gibbs (Obama spokeman) said in a statement.

Pentagon spokeswomen Pentagon spokeswoman Elizabeth Hibner said the base was ``prepared to host him, but his campaign canceled the visit.''

Obama ``was told he could visit as an official but he cannot come in an election capacity, not visit with his campaign staff,'' Hibner said in a telephone interview. She said Obama did make phone calls today to wounded soldiers at the base.

Bloomberg.com: Worldwide
Here ya go Joe....unless you want to choose to ignore it again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2008, 12:05 PM
 
351 posts, read 338,325 times
Reputation: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeP View Post
No you do you need to read as you continue to make an ass of yourself. The only thing that is disgusting is your willful ignorance of these matters.

The Pentagon deemed his trip political - period. It was THEIR choice, not Obama's to prohibit the visit.

I can't wait to hear who from the Pentagon is responsible for the ridiculous action.
Such ignorance here try reading outside of the pmsnbc box for once. Obama could have gone arrangements had already been made for his staff off base, but that was not the photo back drop Obamanation wanted so he snubbed our troops for shopping. You are the moron for not looking into more than one source before you try to get in a c*ck fight. With a female who just won I might add.

Geoff Morrell, Pentagon press secretary, said the military had arranged for Obama to visit Landstuhl Army Regional Medical Center as a U.S. senator but not as a presidential candidate. That's because Pentagon policy prohibits campaigning at military sites. The ground rules should be familiar to Obama since they governed a recent visit he made to Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Morrell said.
The Pentagon arranged for Obama to visit Landstuhl and for his campaign staff and traveling press corps to be accommodated at a nearby airport, Morrell said.
"The Obama campaign was advised that Sen. Obama would be most welcome to visit Landstuhl or any other military hospital in his official capacity as a United States senator," Morrell said. "But his campaign staff would not be."

Jonathan Martin's Blog: DOD spokesman says Obama camp was reminded of political rules - Politico.com
CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - Pentagon was concerned with Obama visit to hospital « - Blogs from CNN.com
Obama campaign says Pentagon felt visit to wounded troops would be a 'campaign event' - On Politics - USATODAY.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2008, 03:19 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,039,351 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
I can't wait to hear who from the Pentagon is responsible for the ridiculous action.
Seem you have your answer - The idiot is Obama.

Obama camp explains Landstuhl decision - First Read - msnbc.com

Quote:
The view from the Pentagon
Did the Pentagon discourage Obama from visiting Landstuhl? "No," says Pentagon spokesperson Bryan Whitman.

Did the Pentagon tell Senator Obama that it was inappropriate for him to visit because he is on a campaign trip? "No. That's inaccurate," Whitman said.
Was Obama's Senate office told that he and his Senate staff could visit the facility? "Absolutely."

"As a sitting United States senator, Obama obviously has an official interest in the well being of our service members and how the wounded are being treated," Whitman said, adding:"He is welcome to visit a military medical center any time that he wants to. As you all know, we do have certain policy guidelines for political campaigns and elections and what is appropriate and what's not appropriate in those situations," Whitman said. "The Pentagon did not tell the senator that he could not visit Landstuhl."

"If you are both a sitting senator and a political candidate when you are doing things like a visit to Landstuhl, you need to do it in your capacity as a sitting senator or you have to do it with the restrictions that apply," Whitman added. Those restrictions include the law that campaign events may not be conducted on a military installation.
Seems pretty clear-cut to me. Obama couldn't USE the troops as a campaign prop. Simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2008, 03:38 PM
 
5,696 posts, read 6,221,503 times
Reputation: 1944
the whole frigging trip was political and staged.
good grief!
obama did not go because he would not get to use our wounded troops as a
photo prop.
he had rather work out.
what a jerk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2008, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,039,351 times
Reputation: 7118
Alas, it seems he did thank the troops.....



Just now ours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top