Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-08-2008, 10:15 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,662 posts, read 3,834,172 times
Reputation: 580

Advertisements

Obama willing to invade Pakistan in al-Qaeda hunt - Times Online

Just over a year ago, Obama stated he would invade Pakistan without permission – a key US ally against terrorism and a nuclear power with 8x the population of Iraq, to hunt down al-Qaeda.

If remnants of al-Qaeda then crossed over the Pakistani border could we be saying that Pakistan didn't have an al-Qaeda presence?

"Pakistan, a key ally of the US in the war on terrorism, reacted angrily, advising all American politicians to refrain from inflammatory remarks. “These are serious matters and should not be used for point-scoring,” Tasnim Aslam, a spokeswoman for the Pakistani Foreign Ministry, said. “Political candidates and commentators should show responsibility.”"

Is this Obama's idea of diplomacy and tact? Scary stuff when a child tries to act tough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-08-2008, 10:19 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,624,161 times
Reputation: 1680
Mr Obama said: “There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again . . . If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.”
From your SOURCE

Let's see....this made sense to everyone but you? Didn't the President do Exactly this, shortly after this statement back in August 2007?

Yeesh...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2008, 10:25 AM
 
3,301 posts, read 6,335,288 times
Reputation: 810
Barack Hussein Obama II will destroy all of our nuclear weapons.

Once these evil weapons are destroyed, NO country will bother us because they will feel we are nice people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2008, 10:31 AM
 
Location: DC area
1,718 posts, read 2,428,517 times
Reputation: 663
Come on, neither candidate should inspire you to have the warm and fuzzies for them over the nuclear issue. I'm still blinking over McCain's response to the Russia/Georgia issue. On a whole though, going into Pakistan after Al Queda certainly has more merit than going into Iraq after them doesn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2008, 11:38 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,662 posts, read 3,834,172 times
Reputation: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGrey View Post
. . . On a whole though, going into Pakistan after Al Queda certainly has more merit than going into Iraq after them doesn't it?
Why? In Pakistan you have an ally assisting in the search -- they have produced results although everyone admittedly wants bin Laden's head. In Iraq you had an anti-American dictator offering sanctuary for bin Laden (according to the bi-partisan 9/11 report.)

Regardless, most after Iraq would in Aug 07 learned enough to at least be cautious about invading another country. No Obama. Ally or no ally, and while in the midst of the Iraq dark days, he's all for invading another country in an effort to look tough. Hillary blasted him on it at the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2008, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Texas
835 posts, read 1,324,068 times
Reputation: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by LNTT_Vacationer View Post
Why? In Pakistan you have an ally assisting in the search -- they have produced results although everyone admittedly wants bin Laden's head. In Iraq you had an anti-American dictator offering sanctuary for bin Laden (according to the bi-partisan 9/11 report.)

Regardless, most after Iraq would in Aug 07 learned enough to at least be cautious about invading another country. No Obama. Ally or no ally, and while in the midst of the Iraq dark days, he's all for invading another country in an effort to look tough. Hillary blasted him on it at the time.
Well said!
Obama can do it but not GWB. Hmmm Of course Saddam was not an ally and not helping with Al-Qaeda...Pakistan is trying but it is a civil war for them as Al-Qaeda have married into their society and now you are asking the Pakistani people to kill and imprison their own family members. Not an easy task and not a good idea to invade when they are working to help us while working against their own families. Obama Change that will have the entire Middle East firing missiles in our direction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2008, 03:51 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,938,173 times
Reputation: 14345
Seems to me that GWB is doing it, right now. Didn't we cross into Pakistan twice this past week? We might have had an ally in Musharraf, but he was a military dictator in a politically unstable country. The writing was on the wall over a year ago when this Obama quote occurred, and since then the situation in Pakistan (a country with nuclear capability) has become even more precarious. Seems to me that if Obama says he would pursue Al-Qaeda into Pakistan he's damned for inflaming the Mid-East, but if he didn't he'd be damned by the same people who criticize Clinton for not being more vigorous in his pursuit of bin Laden pre-9/11.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top