Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-23-2008, 11:23 AM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,451,330 times
Reputation: 3050

Advertisements

Our Statement on Senator Obama's Economic Plan
(369 Signatories so far)

Barack Obama argues that his proposals to raise tax rates and halt international trade agreements would benefit the American economy. They would do nothing of the sort.
Economic analysis and historical experience show that they would do the opposite.
They would reduce economic growth and decrease the number of jobs in America. Moreover, with the credit crunch, the housing slump, and high energy prices weakening the U.S. economy, his proposals run a high risk of throwing the economy into a deep recession.
It was exactly such misguided tax hikes and protectionism, enacted when the U.S. economy was weak in the early 1930s, that greatly increased the severity of the Great Depression.

We are very concerned with Barack Obama's opposition to trade agreements such as the pending one with Colombia, the new one with Central America, or the established one with Canada and Mexico.

Exports from the United States to other countries create jobs for Americans.
In the second quarter of this year, for example, increased international trade did far more to stimulate the U.S. economy than the federal government's "stimulus" package.

Ironically, rather than supporting international trade, Barack Obama is now proposing yet another so-called stimulus package, which would do very little to grow the economy.
And his proposal to finance the package with higher taxes on oil would raise oil prices directly and by reducing exploration and production.

Economists For McCain (http://www.economistsformccain.com/ObamaStatement.html#Signatories - broken link)


*********************************



Hundreds of Economists Sign Letter Opposing Obama's Tax Plan

Hundreds of economists (including Nobel Prize winners Gary Becker, James Buchanan, Robert Mundell, Edward Prescott, and Vernon Smith) have signed letters opposing Barack Obama's economic and tax plans (here, here, and here):

We are equally concerned with his proposals to increase tax rates on labor income and investment.
His dividend and capital gains tax increases would reduce investment and cut into the savings of millions of Americans.

His proposals to increase income and payroll tax rates would discourage the formation and expansion of small businesses and reduce employment and take-home pay, as would his mandates on firms to provide expensive health insurance.

After hearing such economic criticism of his proposals, Barack Obama has apparently suggested to some people that he might postpone his tax increases, perhaps to 2010.
But it is a mistake to think that postponing such tax increases would prevent their harmful effect on the economy today.
The prospect of such tax rate increases in 2010 is already a drag on the economy.

Businesses considering whether to hire workers today and expand their operations have time horizons longer than a year or two, so the prospect of higher taxes starting in 2009 or 2010 reduces hiring and investment in 2008.

TaxProf Blog: Hundreds of Economists Sign Letter Opposing Obama's Tax Plan
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2008, 11:25 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Gee, how many of those economists have been advisors to the current regime and responsible for the current economic crisis?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 11:27 AM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,197,819 times
Reputation: 4027
Economists support Obama over McCain by more than 2 to 1.

Economists for Obama
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 11:29 AM
 
1,989 posts, read 4,466,801 times
Reputation: 1401
So this was a spontaneous act of a bunch of economists? Or was there a bit of coaxing by the GOP.

Can you say Swiftboat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 11:29 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,889,770 times
Reputation: 14345
They are "Economists for McCain". Whose tax plan did you expect them to support?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 11:31 AM
 
1,989 posts, read 4,466,801 times
Reputation: 1401
By the way, I voted for McCain in 2000. This year, I won't, but my brother will. My brother, who I dearly love, who is an extremely successful businessman and most likely a multi-millionaire (we don't talk money in my family, but I'm guessing based on his house.)

Most of Wall Street is probably voting for McCain. So are these economists.

Not everyone sees that as an endorsement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 11:35 AM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,451,330 times
Reputation: 3050
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Gee, how many of those economists have been advisors to the current regime and responsible for the current economic crisis?
Gee some of these people are from the blessed Harvard, University of Chicago, hmmmm.......... Imagine....... It...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 11:36 AM
 
2,488 posts, read 2,935,396 times
Reputation: 830
Joe the economist
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 11:38 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
Gee some of these people are from the blessed Harvard, University of Chicago, hmmmm.......... Imagine....... It...


And your point wouldd be??????????????????

After all, we've already witnessed the incredible incompetence of at least one Yale graduate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2008, 11:38 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,049 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
Economists support Obama over McCain by more than 2 to 1.

Economists for Obama
Hmmm... 66% of 523 surveyed economists are voting for Obama. That's 345 economists. But, according to The Economist, 530 economists have endorsed McCain's economic plan.

Obama falls short - by nearly 200 economists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top