Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-02-2008, 10:32 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,935,966 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Trying to explain Obama's associations with Wright, and others.


YouTube - ATLAS SHRUGS: Jerrold Nadler admits Obama is "Not Politically Courageous"

Quote:
"Obama didn't have the political courage to make a statement and walk out." [of Reverend Wright's racist church]
These are NY Jews who are asking Nadler about Wright.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:00 AM
 
3,085 posts, read 7,247,751 times
Reputation: 1627




Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:04 AM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,975,080 times
Reputation: 4555
3 GOP House seats in New York gone in less than 48hrs...LOL

And the thread starter is talking about how a Dem is "between a rock and a hard place"....ooooh.

I'm sure Dems in New York are just scared to death of a small group of fringe Neocons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:09 AM
 
2,661 posts, read 2,902,996 times
Reputation: 366
I just saw an old clip (when the Wright "scandal" first came up during the primaries) where Obama explained that he wasn't in Church during the racist rants. And so far, I've seen two clips. Two. In 20 years, there's two clips.

So from those two clips, do we assume that Wright ranted like that every sunday? every wednesday?
Or do we assume that these rants were relatively uncommon?

Of course, if someone is already inclined not to trust Obama - there's no point in arguing over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 12:15 AM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,975,080 times
Reputation: 4555
Quote:
Originally Posted by compJockey View Post
I just saw an old clip (when the Wright "scandal" first came up during the primaries) where Obama explained that he wasn't in Church during the racist rants. And so far, I've seen two clips. Two. In 20 years, there's two clips.

So from those two clips, do we assume that Wright ranted like that every sunday? every wednesday?
Or do we assume that these rants were relatively uncommon?

Of course, if someone is already inclined not to trust Obama - there's no point in arguing over it.
I'm almost a 100% issue voter. These personal attacks go right over my head.

If I trust you to vote in my interests. Then you can be a former terrorist for all I care. (But not a coal hater...that's where I draw the line...LOL)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top