Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-17-2016, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Kingdom of pain, Southern Europe
1,304 posts, read 1,128,719 times
Reputation: 1297

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yanagisawa View Post
After reading The Chernobyl accident
UNSCEAR's assessments of the radiation effects
, I can't understand why.

Drinking alcohol and smoking have caused more deaths than the Chernobyl accident has.
Yeah maybe it has something to do with Chernobyl having been a single accident where people cleaned up the soil itself while alcohol and smoking are widely accepted practices.

Last edited by Arigarisha; 03-17-2016 at 08:36 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2016, 04:29 AM
 
919 posts, read 840,791 times
Reputation: 373
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arigarisha View Post
Yeah maybe it has something to do with Chernobyl having been a single accident where people cleaned up the soil itself while alcohol and smoking are widely accepted practices.
True. And that's why we don't have to worry about nuclear power, but we should about alcohol and smoking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2016, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Kingdom of pain, Southern Europe
1,304 posts, read 1,128,719 times
Reputation: 1297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yanagisawa View Post
True. And that's why we don't have to worry about nuclear power, but we should about alcohol and smoking.
Did you go on a field trip to Fukushima when the crisis happened or did you clench your butthole like everyone else?

Regardless, there's a lot to worry about nuclear power.
Like all the nuclear waste it generates with which we can't do anything, nor is there a way to safely dispose of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2016, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Estonia
1,704 posts, read 1,838,977 times
Reputation: 2293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arigarisha View Post
Did you go on a field trip to Fukushima when the crisis happened or did you clench your butthole like everyone else?

Regardless, there's a lot to worry about nuclear power.
Like all the nuclear waste it generates with which we can't do anything, nor is there a way to safely dispose of it.
I think there might be some beneficial use of nuclear waste, but is just hasn't been discovered yet, like curing cancer or something like that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2016, 07:23 AM
 
Location: Kingdom of pain, Southern Europe
1,304 posts, read 1,128,719 times
Reputation: 1297
Quote:
Originally Posted by KuuKulgur View Post
I think there might be some beneficial use of nuclear waste, but is just hasn't been discovered yet, like curing cancer or something like that
If that were the case, I reckon the produced waste of a single nuclear power plant would be enough to cure the whole planet. What do you do with the rest?
Hope it doesn't spill?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2016, 07:26 AM
 
Location: Estonia
1,704 posts, read 1,838,977 times
Reputation: 2293
Build spacecrafts that run on nuclear waste and go conquer the universe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2016, 07:32 AM
 
Location: Kingdom of pain, Southern Europe
1,304 posts, read 1,128,719 times
Reputation: 1297
Quote:
Originally Posted by KuuKulgur View Post
Build spacecrafts that run on nuclear waste and go conquer the universe.
If that were possible Nasa would be studying it.
They're planning to send people to Mars and having this extra fuel would be a great help. But instead, they're growing plants on space.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2016, 05:00 AM
 
919 posts, read 840,791 times
Reputation: 373
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arigarisha View Post
Did you go on a field trip to Fukushima when the crisis happened or did you clench your butthole like everyone else?
None. I was living in Shanghai, China then.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arigarisha View Post
Regardless, there's a lot to worry about nuclear power.
Like all the nuclear waste it generates with which we can't do anything, nor is there a way to safely dispose of it.
Tell me how many people will be killed by the Chernobyl accident in next 10000 years. I guess the number won't exceed the number which has been killed by smoking and alcohol in recent 100 years in Russia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2016, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Kingdom of pain, Southern Europe
1,304 posts, read 1,128,719 times
Reputation: 1297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yanagisawa View Post
Tell me how many people will be killed by the Chernobyl accident in next 10000 years. I guess the number won't exceed the number which has been killed by smoking and alcohol in recent 100 years in Russia.
"Since bears kill less people than smoking and alcohol I'll just poke this one until it wakes up oops I lost an arm how unfortunate."
-Yanagisawa, before being mauled to death.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2016, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Gatineau, QC, Canada
3,379 posts, read 5,538,736 times
Reputation: 4438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yanagisawa View Post
After reading The Chernobyl accident
UNSCEAR's assessments of the radiation effects
, I can't understand why.

Drinking alcohol and smoking have caused more deaths than the Chernobyl accident has.


The Animals of Chernobyl: Photos
First of all, it's not even possible to quantify exactly the effects of Chernobyl. Cancers, such as thyroid, have indeed increased since the incident, and there has been a very profound effect on human health and beyond.

The fact that animals now 'roam freely' around the exclusion zone tells me absolutely nothing. Cancers have latency periods. Living organisms can't feel their health deteriorating from living in contaminated zones unless their exposure is so high, it causes acute sickness. It is a path that takes years for issues to manifest, but when they do, they do. And that's the issue with radioisotope contamination. Just because only 'some' people and animals were affected immediately, that doesn't mean that tens of thousands won't be affected years to decades after.

Nuclear power annoys me. Three absolute failures so far in what? 80 years? Not to mention the amount of misplaced material that wound up in a shipping yard or landfill and acutely poisoned people not even related to the field. We're not going to get it right. Scrap it.

Last edited by Rozenn; 03-21-2016 at 01:10 PM.. Reason: Orphaned - Response to an edited post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top