Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Exercise and Fitness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-08-2011, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Everybody is going to hurt you, you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for-B Marley
9,516 posts, read 20,012,452 times
Reputation: 9418

Advertisements

I'm going to try to use common sense here and say, yes, 2 to 4 15 minute sessions on the treadmill (100% max incline all the way) and spread throughout the day, is just as effective as 1 to 2 30 minute sessions, am I correct?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-09-2011, 11:40 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,395,288 times
Reputation: 10467
Just as effective at what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 11:50 AM
 
Location: Everybody is going to hurt you, you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for-B Marley
9,516 posts, read 20,012,452 times
Reputation: 9418
Read it again but slower this time. LOL

I ask because someone told me to get the maximum effect, I have to do 30 to 60 minutes nonstop. Someone else said it's better to break it up because it keeps your metaboism going stronger all day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 03:49 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,395,288 times
Reputation: 10467
Maximum effect in what respect? Caloric burn? Cardiovascular improvement? What metric are you using to measure your workouts?

That's what I meant by my first post - just as effective at doing *what*?

I don't buy into multiple workouts keeping your metabolism at a higher overall rate, no. Are you doing any resistance training?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Everybody is going to hurt you, you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for-B Marley
9,516 posts, read 20,012,452 times
Reputation: 9418
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Maximum effect in what respect? Caloric burn? Cardiovascular improvement? What metric are you using to measure your workouts?
I think you're over-thinking/over complicating this a bit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 07:34 PM
 
Location: SE Michigan
968 posts, read 2,590,149 times
Reputation: 504
It doesn't matter.

tough to answer when no one knows what you're trying to acheive.

Fitness is goal oriented, not just going through the motions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Everybody is going to hurt you, you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for-B Marley
9,516 posts, read 20,012,452 times
Reputation: 9418
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crustedfilth View Post
It doesn't matter.

tough to answer when no one knows what you're trying to acheive.

Fitness is goal oriented, not just going through the motions.
Oh gee I dunno, what do most want from working out--the whole package of deal of benefits maybe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 09:31 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, LA
1,846 posts, read 3,942,174 times
Reputation: 3376
For losing weight, they are equal. My Weight Watchers leader told me so.

For building muscle, I'm not sure but I think they probably aren't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 04:43 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,395,288 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whyte Byrd View Post
I think you're over-thinking/over complicating this a bit.

No, I'm not. Are you simply looking to burn calories or are you training for a specific event, like a 5K or half-marathon for example.

If you're just looking to lose weight, total calories burned each day is what you're after. Doesn't matter if you do it spread out over 10 workouts or all in one.

If you're looking to improve cardiovascular fitness/performance, the longer workouts will be more beneficial.

If you have other goals, the answers may be different still. You need to clearly define what you're after for us to provide the best advice.

Sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2011, 04:46 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,395,288 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whyte Byrd View Post
Oh gee I dunno, what do most want from working out--the whole package of deal of benefits maybe?
See, I'm not the only one who feels under-informed...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Exercise and Fitness
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top