Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I wonder, do you think polo shirts should have tennis tails or not? For those who don't know what that is, that is where the rear is longer than the front. Usually most Ralph Lauren polo shirts have them while most current Lacoste polo shirts do not. Ironically, Lacoste actually invented the tennis tail, but most of the newest Lacoste polos lack them.
Some claim that polo shirts without tennis tails tend to look better untucked than those with them. Does anyone think that statement is true? Most of my polos have tennis tails, but I was surprised that the one I just bought doesn't have it.
Not tennis tails, those are for be tucked in the pants and that look is outdated as seem as dorky.
The polos now must be untucked and the tennis tails are useless nowadays.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.