Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-08-2011, 12:16 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,095 posts, read 41,226,282 times
Reputation: 45086

Advertisements

Fires were common back then. Losing the only copy would seem to be a predictable misfortune.

Why did not the states keep a copy and send the feds a copy?

It seems so logical now that we have computers and back things up as a matter of routine.

Edited to add: It seems the fire did not completely do the job. There was also a contribution from the bureaucrats:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1890_United_States_Census:

"In December 1932, following standard Federal record-keeping procedures, the Chief Clerk of the Bureau of the Census sent the Librarian of Congress a list of papers to be destroyed, including the original 1890 census schedules. The Librarian was asked by the Bureau to identify any records which should be retained for historical purposes, but the Librarian did not accept the census records. Congress authorized destruction of that list of records on February 21, 1933, and the surviving original 1890 census records were destroyed by government order by 1934 or 1935. The other censuses for which almost all information has been lost are the 1800 and 1810 enumerations."

I guess the Librarian felt the damaged records were useless. A shame, since now a lot could be reconstructed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-08-2011, 04:13 AM
bjh
 
60,055 posts, read 30,368,879 times
Reputation: 135750
It sure would help bridge a lot of gaps.

Maybe we can credit an oxymoron: government efficiency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2011, 06:14 AM
 
356 posts, read 829,760 times
Reputation: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjh View Post
It sure would help bridge a lot of gaps.

Maybe we can credit an oxymoron: government efficiency.
hahahahaha!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2011, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
6,413 posts, read 12,138,742 times
Reputation: 5860
The census was taken so they'd have an accounting of the population ... strictly a numbers thing. Thankfully, they eventually decided to list everyone in the household. But they didn't take it so we'd have it to do our genealogy 125 years later. Long-term preservation wasn't in the plan, because as with counting anything ... it's obsolete the minute you do it. They just wanted to know how many people there were, and where.

Generally speaking, there possibly were THREE copies of the census made. The census enumerator took the census in a book that could be carried with them as they went house to house. That was transferred to the pages in the format we commonly see as the census. If the states wanted to keep a copy (at their option), another copy from that first copy was made and then sent to the federal government. Apparently, most states didn't keep a copy, and just sent on copy #1. Some did, and exist (probably) in the state's archives. And a very few of some of those initial enumeration books exist. The number of errors discovered among the three are scary ... which helps even more to make the census unreliable.

But a lot of states took their own censuses on the "5" years. They make for a good fill-in for the missing 1890. Tax lists, city directories are just some of the other records that can be useful in filling the gap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2011, 07:06 AM
bjh
 
60,055 posts, read 30,368,879 times
Reputation: 135750
I seem to remember reading years ago that they had multiple copies stored in the ONE place, unlike other census year records that were stored in different locations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2011, 08:25 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,095 posts, read 41,226,282 times
Reputation: 45086
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjh View Post
I seem to remember reading years ago that they had multiple copies stored in the ONE place, unlike other census year records that were stored in different locations.
Oh, now that shows some foresight!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2011, 09:06 PM
 
4,135 posts, read 10,810,109 times
Reputation: 2698
Some areas even did an 1892 census in NY. Hard to find data on it though. NY state had a fire about 1911 in the state archives, so a lot of other things are missing

Link on archival mishaps:

Archival Milestones
"1911 Fire in New York State Capitol destroyed much of New York state's archives"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2011, 09:35 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,095 posts, read 41,226,282 times
Reputation: 45086
Default Georgia courthouse fires

Georgia Courthouse Fires

During the 1976 Meriwether County Courthouse fire, a lady who worked there tossed all the records she could into the safe, locked it, and escaped out a window.

I think of her every time I go there and sit in the vault to look at original records.

My uncle helped to rebuild the courthouse.

Meriwether County Courthouse

The mason mentioned in the story about the original courthouse should be Hinson Jackson. He was an ancestor of mine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2011, 05:17 AM
bjh
 
60,055 posts, read 30,368,879 times
Reputation: 135750
^
Awesome
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top