Quote:
Originally Posted by cfbs2691
I say the opposite of this.
I've found private landlord's to be quicker to take care of their investment/property, and corporate run complexes are more expensive and raise the rents more than a private landlord who'd prefer to keep a tenant long term.
|
Have to agree. Before I bought my little house in San Francisco years ago, I rented a flat in a 3-unit building from a man who owned several apartment buildings in the city. The very few times there was a maintenance problem, he was there that day to fix it - even got me a new stove the next day when the old one died and couldn't be repaired.
He saw what good care I took of the apartment and never raised my rent in the 6 years I lived there, even though with rent control he could have raised it a certain amount each year. After a few years of this, I said, "Ed, not that I'm complaining, but you could be raising my rent every year," and he said that he had tenants that trashed his property to the point where when they moved, he had to do a lot of work before he could rent the place again, and "I want you to stay." And if I hadn't decided to buy a house, I would have.
I know that no corporate-managed apartment manager would do that. There *are* good landlords out there, though I know it was just dumb luck that I found one.