Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-16-2010, 11:36 PM
 
Location: ☀ ѕυnѕнιne ѕтaтe ☀
1,416 posts, read 3,211,735 times
Reputation: 253

Advertisements

Would you rather live in a work-filled city and take a vacation to somewhere thats laid back or would you rather live somewhere thats laid back?

I have done both. Being from Orlando(City Proper) it is work filled. I live now in the suburbs where it is laid back. I was just wondering what other people felt. People are always bashing out on Orlando about the tourism economy, cool no problem with me but when it comes to living, lets just take a second and think about it. How is it for the bigger cities? I'm curious to know where some of you would rather take a vacation if you live in a work filled city? I can take a vacation in Orlando and not feel like I'm in Orlando which is a plus if I really don't feel like traveling. But anyhow,

Live somewhere work-filled, no matter the type of economy and take a vacation somewhere more laid back?

Or Vice Versa?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2010, 11:46 PM
 
2,413 posts, read 5,749,864 times
Reputation: 1221
I would rather live somewhere stress-free and laid back. Preferably in a coastal or beach community.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2010, 11:50 PM
 
Location: ☀ ѕυnѕнιne ѕтaтe ☀
1,416 posts, read 3,211,735 times
Reputation: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB Fla View Post
I would rather live somewhere stress-free and laid back. Preferably in a coastal or beach community.
I could understand. but what about vacation? Would you rather travel or stay where it is already stress free?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 12:02 AM
 
Location: St Paul, MN - NJ's Gold Coast
5,251 posts, read 13,817,095 times
Reputation: 3178
I have mixed feelings on this topic.
I always loved urban dense living and being able to conveniently walk places (dining out, markets, public trans, etc), but another thing I dream of doing is living on/by a lake in a small-mid (somewhat rural) city in upstate NY.

I've moved a lot growing up, and it has always been in densely populated neighborhoods. I was always near a mini market, I always had those few great eatery's in walking distance, and my neighborhood friends were ALWAYS out and about- these weren't big major cities mind you, they were more like urban suburbs. (Denser than a lot of US cities at that)- Basically, I have to have a touch of urban in a place.

This is why I'm usually drawn to mid-sized cities. (Syracuse, Albany, Providence, etc) where it's not so fast paced (and a bit more relaxing), but you get that balance of a subtle urban lifestyle at the same time. I'm definitely a minority in these parts (General US forum) since a lot of people are very Pro-Big Cities and rule out many mid-sized cities in discussions.
~~

Newark is technically a mid-sized city, but with the population density, public transportation and surrounding areas (Jersey City-Elizabeth-NYC), it's pretty much a part of something bigger than most other urban areas in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 12:10 AM
 
Location: New York
11,326 posts, read 20,331,120 times
Reputation: 6231
Laid back of course, I'm a laid back person. I know for a fact I wouldn't do well in a work-filled environment, when I lived in NYC I only went to Manhattan like 2-4 times a year, yeah it was fun but I could never ever in a million years live there. I was more of a Long Island & Jersey person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,050 posts, read 34,600,599 times
Reputation: 10616
I would rather live exactly where I'm living. Anyplace else is open for consideration as a vacation spot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 08:59 AM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,564 posts, read 28,659,961 times
Reputation: 25154
The places I'm most motivated to live in:

DC metropolitan area - the nation's political capital region
NYC metropolitan area - the capital of everything else that matters

Other places are up for consideration, but those 2 will always take first preference.

For vacationing, nowhere surpasses Europe.

Last edited by BigCityDreamer; 06-17-2010 at 09:36 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2010, 02:35 PM
 
2,413 posts, read 5,749,864 times
Reputation: 1221
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLABoyJ View Post
I could understand. but what about vacation? Would you rather travel or stay where it is already stress free?
I would travel anywhere. A busy city, or somewhere relaxing, doesn't matter to me. As long as I live somewhere relaxing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2010, 04:01 PM
 
Location: norcal
609 posts, read 1,260,128 times
Reputation: 422
laid back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2010, 05:19 PM
 
Location: ☀ ѕυnѕнιne ѕтaтe ☀
1,416 posts, read 3,211,735 times
Reputation: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by BPerone201 View Post
I have mixed feelings on this topic.
I always loved urban dense living and being able to conveniently walk places (dining out, markets, public trans, etc), but another thing I dream of doing is living on/by a lake in a small-mid (somewhat rural) city in upstate NY.

I've moved a lot growing up, and it has always been in densely populated neighborhoods. I was always near a mini market, I always had those few great eatery's in walking distance, and my neighborhood friends were ALWAYS out and about- these weren't big major cities mind you, they were more like urban suburbs. (Denser than a lot of US cities at that)- Basically, I have to have a touch of urban in a place.

This is why I'm usually drawn to mid-sized cities. (Syracuse, Albany, Providence, etc) where it's not so fast paced (and a bit more relaxing), but you get that balance of a subtle urban lifestyle at the same time. I'm definitely a minority in these parts (General US forum) since a lot of people are very Pro-Big Cities and rule out many mid-sized cities in discussions.
~~

Newark is technically a mid-sized city, but with the population density, public transportation and surrounding areas (Jersey City-Elizabeth-NYC), it's pretty much a part of something bigger than most other urban areas in the US.


why not live in Both? I mean I love Newark. Only thing I do not like about Newark is the over shadowing of NYC. Like now I live in a city where it is bustling but I do have that option on the laid back peaceful living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top