Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think it could be more interesting to hear about the cities that don't have any suburbs over 100,000.
But, back to the original topic, Raleigh has one suburb over 100K: Cary at ~140,000. It's the exception and is North Carolina's largest suburb. Unless one actually considers High Point a suburb of Greensboro, Cary is the only suburb in the state that exceeds 100K.
Phoenix does as well...I don't know the exact number but Mesa, Scottsdale, Chandler, and Glendale all have over 100k people.
From highest population to lowest, there's Mesa, Chandler, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert, Tempe, Peoria and Surprise. If the valley ever experienced heavy growth again, then Avondale is the closest to be the next city to crack 100K in population.
MSA: Sterling Heights, Warren
CSA: Ann Arbor, Flint
Windsor if including Canada
Quite a few are just under 100,000
surprisingly Atlanta doesn't have any.
Los Angeles has a TON
Long Beach
Anaheim
Santa Ana
Irvine
Glendale
Huntington Beach
Santa Clarita
Garden Grove
Lancaster
Palmdale
Pomona
Torrance
Orange
Pasadena
Fullerton
El Monte
Downey
Costa Mesa
Inglewood
West Covina
Norwalk
Burbank
# 8 and 9 barely missed the cut by a few hundred people so I just included them anyways.
It's interesting that as densely populated as New Jersey is, and bordering New York City and Philadelphia, that only a few places in the entire state have populations over 100K.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.