Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You do know that Austin has two Fiesta's and one of them is centrally located, right?
I know there are Fiestas in Austin. They don't have as much International stuff in the Austin's Stores. The International isle there is mainly Latin american stuff.
The Fiestas here are whole different story.
HEB's here are different too than the ones in SA and Austin.
HEBs and Fiesta cater to the neighborhood they are in. A centrally located Fiesta in Austin just means it is blandsville in terms of variety of products. You wouldn't believe the stuff you get in the Asian parts of town here.
I know there are Fiestas in Austin. They don't have as much International stuff in the Austin's Stores. The International isle there is mainly Latin american stuff.
The Fiestas here are whole different story.
HEB's here are different too than the ones in SA and Austin.
HEBs and Fiesta cater to the neighborhood they are in. A centrally located Fiesta in Austin just means it is blandsville in terms of variety of products. You wouldn't believe the stuff you get in the Asian parts of town here.
This is tough, most places I like in my state are in the north and i like them because of the nature not the city. I Guess I'd have to say Mackinaw city and Grand Rapids. I currently live in Grand rapids. The pros are it's got great beer/breweries, it's got the best local music (either best or tied with Ann Arbor) for Folk, Jam, and Bluegrass and it's much cleaner and safer than Detroit. The biggest con is it's such a long drive to any awesome nature and if GR was where Mackinaw city was you'd just have to cross the bridge and you could be in the wonderful UP. It still wouldn't be an ideal city, but It would be better than GR is to live in now.
I would combine San Antonio and Austin, for a terrific city.
Wait - they already seem to be combined. I can't tell where one ends and the other starts!
Love me some o dat! I can't imagine ANYONE visiting that area and being disappointed - unless, of course, they expected to find, I don't know, the Alps there or maybe Hadrian's Wall.
Saustin would definitely be a great place to visit, but I still don't think I would want to live there.
Living in Georgia...I think the most common cities that everyone here would love to merge would be Atlanta and Savannah. The new city would be called Atlannah....lol.
Of course the new location would be where Savannah is now. The purpose of this is to put Atlanta closer to the beach/Atlantic Ocean. I'm not sure how this would effect Atlanta's regional stronghold with it's current postion as the "heart" of the south. Atlanntah would be awesome combining Atlanta's BIG CITY amenities with Savannah's history and charm.
It would pretty much wipe out that advantage. Atlanta's strategic geographical location is the only reason why it exists as it was founded as a critical railroad junction.
Detroit and Ann Arbor. I would combine Detroit's rich history, beautiful architecture, major league teams, and gorgeous riverfront with Ann Arbor's safety, job market, university, and overall hipness. It would be an awesome city!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
