Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Which city with a metro population of at least 1 million do you think is the dirtiest in the nation? The cleanest?
Based on my travels, I would have to say that NYC and Dallas both have an old, dirty feel. Old housing, old architecture, beat-up roads, occasional litter here and there, and the stench of fast food everywhere you go. I have yet to visit LA, so I can't comment on that.
As far as the cleanest large cities, I would say Austin, Boston, Raleigh and Orlando are quite clean in appearance.
Which city with a metro population of at least 1 million do you think is the dirtiest in the nation? The cleanest?
Based on my travels, I would have to say that NYC and Dallas both have an old, dirty feel. Old housing, old architecture, beat-up roads, occasional litter here and there, and the stench of fast food everywhere you go. I have yet to visit LA, so I can't comment on that.
As far as the cleanest large cities, I would say Austin, Boston, Raleigh and Orlando are quite clean in appearance.
What do you think?
Dallas makes LA look like Mexico City.
New Orleans is just nasty.
Last edited by Metro Matt; 12-18-2012 at 11:39 PM..
Which city with a metro population of at least 1 million do you think is the dirtiest in the nation? The cleanest?
Based on my travels, I would have to say that NYC and Dallas both have an old, dirty feel. Old housing, old architecture, beat-up roads, occasional litter here and there, and the stench of fast food everywhere you go. I have yet to visit LA, so I can't comment on that.
As far as the cleanest large cities, I would say Austin, Boston, Raleigh and Orlando are quite clean in appearance.
What do you think?
Clearly you haven't been to Philly if you think NYC and Dallas (especially) are dirty. By the way old housing/old architecture is considered historic and many prefer it over soulless modern concrete boxes. In terms of clean big cities, Washington DC should be at or near the top. It's pretty much spotless despite a pretty significant tourist population in addition to the permanent residents.
Clearly you haven't been to Philly if you think NYC and Dallas (especially) are dirty. By the way old housing/old architecture is considered historic and many prefer it over soulless modern concrete boxes. In terms of clean big cities, Washington DC should be at or near the top. It's pretty much spotless despite a pretty significant tourist population in addition to the permanent residents.
u must've only visited the tourist/downtown sections if u think its spotless
Seriously? The roads are all beat up and cracked and it stinks like food everywhere.
maybe if your coming in on i 30 or i 35, but most of the highways are really new, and sunken or surrounded by walls. it all depends where you are. i dont know where you stayed.
Do you think people from dirty cities start these threads? It never occurred to me what a "clean" city was until I lived in a dirtier one, and oh my goodness it makes a difference!
u must've only visited the tourist/downtown sections if u think its spotless
Nope, I actually lived in DC (NW quadrant). There are some less clean areas (low income or industrial sections) but the city overall is quite clean.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.