If money were not an issue, what US city would you live in? (best city, neighborhoods)

[Chips_Challenge]

What is the best city if you're not worried about money? Important criteria would be:

• Walkability
• Nightlife
• Culture (neighborhoods, cuisine, museums, etc.)
• Climate
• Outdoor Recreation
• Energy (does the city feel alive, or is it boring/dead?)
• Young People (no retirement cities please!)
• Not too huge or crowded (NYC, Chicago, LA = too big for my taste)

I've narrowed my list to the cities on the poll, but feel free to mention cities not on the list. Thanks!

[ccm123]

Of the list above, San Francisco, then San Diego, then Portland.

[Mandalorian]

Probably San Diego, but none of them are really that desirable to me.

[Grizzly Addams]

Of these.... San Fran inland. Anywhere? I'd have to say western Wisconsin. It's absolutely beautiful over there, I wish Minnesota had rolling hills like that.


OR the Carolina's/Tennesee. There is something about that area that I am drawn toward.

[PDF]

Out of those? I'd say Portland...because I'd have the money to enjoy it to its fullest.

[StuddedLeather]

From the list San Francisco than San Diego.

My number 1 choice though is NYC.

[bluecarebear]

1. San Fran
2. In the California Mountains
3. Somewhere between San Fran and San Diego

[Chips_Challenge]

Originally Posted by Grizzly Addams

Of these.... San Fran inland. Anywhere? I'd have to say western Wisconsin. It's absolutely beautiful over there, I wish Minnesota had rolling hills like that.

Been there. Beautiful, but also empty. Which I suppose might be a plus for some people.

[KathrynAragon]

None of the above. Big metro areas don't appeal to me. I'd live in Yorktown, VA.

[RocketSci]

Of that group, Portland, because It is close to family and have money to travel to the other places anytime I want.