Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-27-2017, 06:47 PM
 
Location: WA Desert, Seattle native
9,398 posts, read 8,870,959 times
Reputation: 8812

Advertisements

But the definition of "binge drinking" is a lot different than "alcoholic" or "chronic drinker". I think sometimes these subsets within a category can be misleading.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-27-2017, 11:38 PM
 
4,696 posts, read 5,820,739 times
Reputation: 4295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flovis View Post
Smoking cigs is dead in California even in the poorer parts. People prefer the green stuff here, anyways.

Saw massive amounts of smoking while in Florida recently, felt like I was in a time warp.
I bet the south leads in smoking percentages.
and the extremely low smoking rate in California will get even lower when a huge tobacco tax increase kicks in soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2017, 11:42 PM
 
4,696 posts, read 5,820,739 times
Reputation: 4295
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordwillin02 View Post
That stat is meaningless. VA and NC have far more transplants than other southern states and have much bigger populations than say WV or KY which will drive down the percentage. You know that.

50% of cigarettes in the country come from Richmond.
You bring up an important point about transplants. They have a huge impact on everything from voting to smoking. There is County level data available on smoking. If you look at North Carolina, the Research Triangle with TONS of transplants has a very low smoking rate while rural areas with no transplants have much higher levels of smoking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2017, 04:46 AM
 
936 posts, read 822,947 times
Reputation: 2525
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghostee View Post
Not a current smoker here, but are there any states in the US that have a higher tolerance of smoking and smokers than the average?


Missouri (where I live) is a smoker's paradise. About 25% of the population smokes, and we have the lowest cigarette taxes in the US. You can buy a pack of Marlboros for about $3.75 (including tax). A whole carton for about $35 (including tax).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2017, 06:07 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,154,197 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay F View Post
You bring up an important point about transplants. They have a huge impact on everything from voting to smoking. There is County level data available on smoking. If you look at North Carolina, the Research Triangle with TONS of transplants has a very low smoking rate while rural areas with no transplants have much higher levels of smoking.
The rates are probably correlated to educational attainment more so than geography. The Triangle tends to attract more than its fair share of highly educated transplants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2017, 04:24 PM
 
266 posts, read 334,281 times
Reputation: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay F View Post
and the extremely low smoking rate in California will get even lower when a huge tobacco tax increase kicks in soon.
Indeed!

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2017, 06:27 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,722,105 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by tallydude02 View Post
What's interesting is that the states with the highest rate of smoking have the lowest rates of binge drinking.Binge drinking map of America shows worst affected states | Daily Mail Online
Yes, although there are a lot of states with moderate rates of both.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwguy2 View Post
But the definition of "binge drinking" is a lot different than "alcoholic" or "chronic drinker". I think sometimes these subsets within a category can be misleading.
We-el, there's a correlation. Some people are all three. And the map just shows alcohol comsumption, not binge drinking rates. The headline is a bit misleading.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2017, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
4,488 posts, read 1,642,267 times
Reputation: 4136
I hate smoking, unless it's weed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2017, 09:21 PM
 
4,696 posts, read 5,820,739 times
Reputation: 4295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flovis View Post
Indeed!
Looking at that map there is defenetley a "smoking belt" in this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2017, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Land of Ill Noise
3,444 posts, read 3,371,174 times
Reputation: 2209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hapa1 View Post
I hate smoking, unless it's weed.
To each their own. I don't know why, but I always was more annoyed at the stench of weed after someone smokes it. I find tobacco smoke less annoying, but to each their own. Plus I dunno why, but I always liked the friendly atmosphere of smoker friendly bars that used to exist in states where it's now banned(i.e. Illinois, Ohio), and does still exist in some states(i.e. Indiana).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay F View Post
and the extremely low smoking rate in California will get even lower when a huge tobacco tax increase kicks in soon.
More like the black market and unofficial ways to obtain tobacco products will explode, as a result of that foolish tax increase. 'Loosies'(single cigarette sales, albeit not legal) will go up in sales, untaxed(or not properly taxed) illegal cigarette sales will greatly go up as a result, and also those who live near an Indian Reservation or a neighboring state or country(Mexico) will buy more tobacco products from those areas, as a result. California voters really shot themselves by passing this, since it'll only mean reduced tobacco tax income for state government. And is it a smart idea to quietly encourage people to find non-traditional means to buy cigarettes, or other tobacco products? Not to forget e-cigs too, since I heard those were included in this tax increase that took effect. I think not. Too bad voters there didn't narrowly reject this tobacco tax proposal, like they smartly did the last few such proposals over about like a 10 year period.

Check out this report, and you can see how much unofficial sales and people turning to sales of tobacco products outside of their home state really increased, after tobacco tax hikes elsewhere. You especially can see how much certain states are greatly affected by this, such as New York, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Washington. I recommend reading this, for yourself(and I wish they had a newer report than 2014, but this is the newest report they've posted for now): https://taxfoundation.org/cigarette-...ng-state-2014/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top