Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think that an argument can be made for Chicago in tier 1, but yes, Philly is with Boston and SF etc.
Indeed. Chicago & Philly will seemingly always rank amongst the elite class of US cities. I could see it as:
New York - Tier 1A
LA, Chicago, San Francisco - Tier 1B
or
New York, LA - 1A
Chicago - 1B
San Fran, Washington, Philly, Boston, Miami - 2A
Seattle, Atlanta, Dallas Metroplex, Houston - 2B
Twin Cities, Denver, Charlotte, Tampa Bay, Detroit, San Diego, Saint Louis - 3
Orlando, New Orleans, Las Vegas, Nashville, Austin, Portland Or, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Phoenix - 4
Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, Louisville, Sacramento, Kansas City, San Antonio - 5A
Salt Lake City, NC Research Triangle, Memphis, Jacksonville, Richmond, Hampton Roads, Providence, Birmingham - 5B
Tucson, Grand Rapids, Greenville, Fresno, El Paso, Knoxville, Charleston, Columbia, NC Triad, Des Moines, Omaha - Emerging
Status:
"See My Blog Entries for my Top 500 Most Important USA Cities"
(set 11 days ago)
Location: Harrisburg, PA
1,051 posts, read 979,465 times
Reputation: 1406
Quote:
Originally Posted by austiNati
Indeed. Chicago & Philly will seemingly always rank amongst the elite class of US cities. I could see it as:
New York - Tier 1A
LA, Chicago, San Francisco - Tier 1B
or
New York, LA - 1A
Chicago - 1B
San Fran, Washington, Philly, Boston, Miami - 2A
Seattle, Atlanta, Dallas Metroplex, Houston - 2B
Twin Cities, Denver, Charlotte, Tampa Bay, Detroit, San Diego, Saint Louis - 3
Orlando, New Orleans, Las Vegas, Nashville, Austin, Portland Or, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Phoenix - 4
Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, Louisville, Sacramento, Kansas City, San Antonio - 5A
Salt Lake City, NC Research Triangle, Memphis, Jacksonville, Richmond, Hampton Roads, Providence, Birmingham - 5B
Tucson, Grand Rapids, Greenville, Fresno, El Paso, Knoxville, Charleston, Columbia, NC Triad, Des Moines, Omaha - Emerging
This is actually a very good tier ranking. Phoenix is a bit too low. But otherwise, very solid.
This is actually a very good tier ranking. Phoenix is a bit too low. But otherwise, very solid.
Of all the regions, I was torn on Phoenix the most. Based on population, it lines up more with some of the Tier 3 cities. Based on historic and current influence, economic diversity, higher institutions and entertainment; it could float between 3 and 4. I'm envious at how quickly they've been able to expand their light rail, and they're making significant strides in developing a cohesive, dynamic urban core.
For most of my life Phoenix has operated as a mega sprawl, master planned region for folks who want warm winters, and/or are ready to retire. For being such a huge region, it just seemed very lackluster in it's purpose. I get it, people want suburbs; but to not even have 10, 20, 30, even 40 sq miles of walkable urban nodes, in a metro of 3,000+ sq miles is the epitome of blah. As of now, they have Scottsdale (an entirely different city), downtown and midtown Phoenix.
Indeed. Chicago & Philly will seemingly always rank amongst the elite class of US cities. I could see it as:
New York - Tier 1A
LA, Chicago, San Francisco - Tier 1B
or
New York, LA - 1A
Chicago - 1B
San Fran, Washington, Philly, Boston, Miami - 2A
Seattle, Atlanta, Dallas Metroplex, Houston - 2B
Twin Cities, Denver, Charlotte, Tampa Bay, Detroit, San Diego, Saint Louis - 3
Orlando, New Orleans, Las Vegas, Nashville, Austin, Portland Or, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Phoenix - 4
Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, Louisville, Sacramento, Kansas City, San Antonio - 5A
Salt Lake City, NC Research Triangle, Memphis, Jacksonville, Richmond, Hampton Roads, Providence, Birmingham - 5B
Tucson, Grand Rapids, Greenville, Fresno, El Paso, Knoxville, Charleston, Columbia, NC Triad, Des Moines, Omaha - Emerging
Orlando & Baltimore are both larger than Charlotte & St. Louis so they are deep in "3" category.
While Phoenix doesn't have niche, it's still a 5 million metro and off of size alone it's going to fall into the bottom 2B or very top of 3
Indeed. Chicago & Philly will seemingly always rank amongst the elite class of US cities. I could see it as:
New York - Tier 1A
LA, Chicago, San Francisco - Tier 1B
or
New York, LA - 1A
Chicago - 1B
San Fran, Washington, Philly, Boston, Miami - 2A
Seattle, Atlanta, Dallas Metroplex, Houston - 2B
Twin Cities, Denver, Charlotte, Tampa Bay, Detroit, San Diego, Saint Louis - 3
Orlando, New Orleans, Las Vegas, Nashville, Austin, Portland Or, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Phoenix - 4
Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Indianapolis, Milwaukee, Louisville, Sacramento, Kansas City, San Antonio - 5A
Salt Lake City, NC Research Triangle, Memphis, Jacksonville, Richmond, Hampton Roads, Providence, Birmingham - 5B
Tucson, Grand Rapids, Greenville, Fresno, El Paso, Knoxville, Charleston, Columbia, NC Triad, Des Moines, Omaha - Emerging
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,132 posts, read 7,575,946 times
Reputation: 5796
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadedWest2020
NY and LA are on a different level in literally every category.
No "they" are not. Well NYC is, but LA lags behind it in a few categories. It's still tier 1 due to it's size, but there is a gap of NYC to Los Angeles. After them two it's another gap down, Chicago, SF, and DC are each duking it out on the next tier. Boston, Philly, Dallas, Atlanta, H-town make up the next group, but the gap from them isn't as wide, from the Chi-DC-SF group.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.