Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2008, 04:29 PM
 
938 posts, read 4,093,320 times
Reputation: 783

Advertisements

As much as I love Mexicans, adding millions of people of the same race isn't making the place more diverse.

Diversity is when a true mosaic of cultures exists...not 2,000,000 more Michoacans..

 
Old 10-04-2008, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Northeast U.S.
164 posts, read 463,710 times
Reputation: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scraper Enthusiast View Post
Hmm, do you not think that the deliberate importation of non-whites into white homelands (countries) is not by design to make whites a minority in their own homelands? Do you not find it odd that most governments in said countries go against their people's wishes by importing non-whites?

Given differential birthrates, as well as radical agendas of certain non-whites, particularly with regard to Muslims in European countries, what kind of future is there for white people in such countries where they are being forced to accept the genocide of their countries?
So, the would-be exterminators of the white race are a combination of fanatical non-white racists, and politicians and other people of power in majority-white countries.

The motives of the first group are clear, but what's in it for people in the second category? They're also white, overwhelmingly, and while racial self-hatred exists, actively genocidal racial self-hatred must be pretty rare. Do they just despise European/ Western traditions and work toward abolishing these without considering that they're ultimately working against white people themselves? Do they place their own immediate economic benefit above everything else? Do they long to be part of a small class of wealthy whites ruling over a mostly poor, mostly non-white population, thinking that their power will grow as the average income of their inferiors falls?
 
Old 10-04-2008, 06:46 PM
 
1,178 posts, read 3,834,518 times
Reputation: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marya View Post
So, the would-be exterminators of the white race are a combination of fanatical non-white racists, and politicians and other people of power in majority-white countries.

The motives of the first group are clear, but what's in it for people in the second category? They're also white, overwhelmingly, and while racial self-hatred exists, actively genocidal racial self-hatred must be pretty rare. Do they just despise European/ Western traditions and work toward abolishing these without considering that they're ultimately working against white people themselves? Do they place their own immediate economic benefit above everything else? Do they long to be part of a small class of wealthy whites ruling over a mostly poor, mostly non-white population, thinking that their power will grow as the average income of their inferiors falls?
It's called socialism, or cultural marxism, and it is a belief that has gained widespread acceptance in the population, the result of a media empire that has been infiltrated over the decades by individuals who support and disseminate such views. Complementary to such belief system is its ally, "political correctness", which has rendered many whites fearful of stating their beliefs, for fear of being called a racist, or for stating their true wishes and desires. No more is this seen than with politicians and individuals who are in positions of public influence. Faced with following their own beliefs and hearing about it via the wrath of the media, or maintaining the status quo against the white population, many, not wanting to lose their positions or income, choose to maintain the status quo of discrimination against whites. Remember, many of these so-called ideas, such as opening up immigration to non-whites in 1965, or promoting civil rights laws in 1964 (which later morphed into things much larger than they were supposed to get-such as affirmative action laws, etc.) were first presented to the public, or posed in the government as being all about inclusivity. However, as we can clearly see, the politicians desires to stop the negative ramifications of such a policy are now deemed discriminatory, so they're fearful of doing anything to stop it.
 
Old 10-05-2008, 09:57 AM
 
1,149 posts, read 5,634,222 times
Reputation: 624
What happened to the 10 year old thread starter with one post. Interesting.
 
Old 10-05-2008, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
3,410 posts, read 4,465,497 times
Reputation: 3286
It's not changing demographics in itself that has people who consider themselves to be "intellectuals" worried, it's whether or not the increasing numbers of Hispanics and Asians will/can integrate into everyday American life. I personally know a lot people of Hispanic and Asian backgrounds(I'm Asian) who are regular suburbanites, and even some who are rather successful/wealthy businessmen, so it's more the illegal immigrant element that I'm worried about.

Even though I'm a Democrat, the kow-towing to illegal immigration is a bad mix of Far Leftism, Identity Politics, NeoCon strategy, and just plain old pandering to businesses. The David Dukes of the world shouldn't justify the flagrant violations of our laws.
 
Old 10-05-2008, 05:20 PM
 
1,178 posts, read 3,834,518 times
Reputation: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerJAX View Post
It's not changing demographics in itself that has people who consider themselves to be "intellectuals" worried, it's whether or not the increasing numbers of Hispanics and Asians will/can integrate into everyday American life. I personally know a lot people of Hispanic and Asian backgrounds(I'm Asian) who are regular suburbanites, and even some who are rather successful/wealthy businessmen, so it's more the illegal immigrant element that I'm worried about.

Even though I'm a Democrat, the kow-towing to illegal immigration is a bad mix of Far Leftism, Identity Politics, NeoCon strategy, and just plain old pandering to businesses. The David Dukes of the world shouldn't justify the flagrant violations of our laws.
What "flagrant violation of our laws" would you be referring?
 
Old 10-05-2008, 06:37 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
3,410 posts, read 4,465,497 times
Reputation: 3286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scraper Enthusiast View Post
What "flagrant violation of our laws" would you be referring?
Hmm, I dunno... our immigration laws maybe?
 
Old 10-06-2008, 01:45 PM
 
983 posts, read 3,597,879 times
Reputation: 431
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimihendrixfan View Post
According to: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7559996.stm whites will become a minority in 2042.

Is this actually possible? Did the people who made this estimate make prior estimates on population demographics? Were those prior estimates accurate?

How can whites become a minority if they comprise about 70% of the population?
I'd take no stock in it, for:

-The definition of "white" has always been modified over time.
There were times when Southern Asians and Latinos were considered "white", and when Irish, Jews, Italians, Eastern and Southern Europeans were not considered "white", etc. It wouldn't surprise me if a part of today's Asians and Latinos were considered "white" by 2042.

-"Interracial marriage".

-etc.
 
Old 11-21-2008, 03:57 PM
 
1 posts, read 1,539 times
Reputation: 10
I'm liberal and open minded but I must say I am surprised by some of the comments here, any country in the world seems like it would resist having the current ethnic popularion usurped by another, yet everyone I see seems to have no problem with it happening here

is this just an american thing, cause we are composed of immigrations because I can't imagine China, or India, or somalia tolerating something like this?

I know ideally american culture would be just the same with a flood of foreign populations but that's just not the case, these groups will be open to america's predominently white culture, but they still have lineages and their own histories to respect

all races deserve to keep their identity, there will be always be distinctions based on genetics, culture, values, history etc, and they can not be ignored

I'm not really stating how people should feel on the issue, I'm just somewhat surprised on the little amount of resistance, wouldn't people in latin america be upset if they became part of anglo america?
 
Old 11-21-2008, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Denver
694 posts, read 2,651,321 times
Reputation: 365
.....Just as long as I don't have to live next door to an
Anorexic Aborigine Transsexual Mormon......they freak
me out.. I mean for starters at some point they may wig out
and try to eat me, convert me, or convince me that the
" Crocodile Dundee" movies didn't suck....and don't get me started
on dudes with two beards having babies.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top