Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yep they done framed OJ......with a blood trail from OJ's shoes into the bronco and over to OJ's and up the stairs at Rockingham. Those cops were good.......LOL
I have an attorney friend that worked closely with Johnny Cochran. I asked him as an insider if he thought O.J. was guilty. His answer from Cochran was that "My client maintains his innocence." We all laughed. We know the truth deep down inside. Sometimes you just have to read between the lines.
I have an attorney friend that worked closely with Johnny Cochran. I asked him as an insider if he thought O.J. was guilty. His answer from Cochran was that "My client maintains his innocence." We all laughed. We know the truth deep down inside. Sometimes you just have to read between the lines.
Johnny Cochran had it wired the minute the jury was selected.......he knew OJ wouldn't ever be convicted with the group seated......and he was right.......they could have had video of the murder and he would have walked. The black and white outlook on OJ is at polar opposites.....ask around a little and you will see it's true..........
Allegedy, O.J. had beaten Nicole Simpson for years, according to what some of Nicole’s friends said she told them. In one such instance of alleged wife beating, detective Mark Furhman had gone to the scene to investigate and supposedly was very bothered by what had taken place and what he saw.
Mark Furhman was the detective that found the second glove at O.J.’s residence. Before the trial started, Attorney Jeffrey Toobin wrote an article for the New Yorker magazine that suggested the second glove had been planted at O.J.’s residence by police.
When F. Lee Bailey cross-examined Furhman on the witness stand, he repeatedly denied ever using the N word. Eventually, a tape recording was played to the jury that contained Furhman using the N word. When Furhman was called back to the witness stand, he stood on the fifth amendment. After the trial was over, he was convicted of felony perjury, which forced him to retire from the L.A.P.D..
Sadly the use of the N word was more important than the vicious slaughter of the two victims. As it was most of the jury were dolts and OJ could’ve murdered a newborn right in front of them and they’d say he was innocent.
OJ's case was far more than celebrity entertainment fodder. Racial divide. Privilege. Politics. Media influence. Domestic Violence. Distrust of Law Enforcement. Morally bankrupt defense attorneys. Inept DA's. Media ***** judge. A jury who could not convict even if they wanted to.
An the fall from grace of a man who was beloved by many. And it was all televised live
The truth is some people will not be happy until OJ is dead and frustrated that the POS never paid for a double homicide. On the other hand there will be those who will mourn his passing. There are not many people (adults) who cross the line on this one, I don't think.
Clara C, most of us weren't even born until after WWII. We cannot relate unless one has a relative who died as a result of the camps/war. I assume you did. That is no reason to go screaming about that "The Trial of the Century" is OJ's for a younger generation.
Yep they done framed OJ......with a blood trail from OJ's shoes into the bronco and over to OJ's and up the stairs at Rockingham. Those cops were good.......LOL
May I offer you the opportunity to review a movie called "star chamber".
It basically confirms your style of processing data.
The "trial of the century" was the Nazi War Crimes Trial in Nuremberg. Never before have the leaders of a country been put on trial for their wrongdoings, by the world court.
Not this one sports figure, who killed his wife and her boyfriend. That's NOT the trial of the century. NOT BY FAR.
That's just celebrity entertainment fodder.
It's not just celebrities. There have been several 'trials of the century' in the US. It is apparently 'hyperbole.' Fitting during this hyperbolic age.
"...Whatever you consider to be the "trial of the century," chances are it wasn't the first, and it certainly won't be the last. Here are 15 from the 20th century—a period of time that happened to be remarkably "trial of the century"-heavy...."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
