Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2019, 06:12 AM
 
10,503 posts, read 7,058,349 times
Reputation: 32344

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph_Kirk View Post
Yes. They tried to frame a guilty man who could afford a dream team defense. The "single assailant" theory simply didn't hold water, which the dream team defense made clear. And the prosecution--which hadn't dealt with much better than public defenders before--were outclassed.

The US has the best justice system money can buy.

Interesting how nobody gets as exercised about Robert Blake being acquitted of murdering his wife.

When it comes to Simpson and Blake, you're comparing apples and oranges.



Well, for multiple reasons, race actually being the least of those. OJ Simpson remained a legit superstar in the eyes of the public. Stud running back. Actor. Sports commentator. The man was close to ubiquitous in the early 90s. OJ Simpson hired an all-star cast of attorneys who did their absolute best to hype this trial, and succeeded.



Robert Blake? A kind of washed-up B-level actor. Even when he was arrested and I remember thinking, "Who? Oh, wasn't he on kind of cop show? The one with the parrot in it?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2019, 11:13 AM
 
Location: Wyoming
9,724 posts, read 21,249,798 times
Reputation: 14823
The trial was great TV. My wife and I both worked out of our home office and watched nearly all of the trial.

We were both surprised at the innocent finding, but I thought the apparently tainted evidence would bring about a mistrial. The gloves. For whatever reason, the gloves didn't fit. Why was OJ asked to put them on? Dumb, dumb, dumb! (At least in retropspect.)

I think the jury, who probably wished for an excuse not to convict OJ, after seeing some of the shoddy evidence decided they had every right to find him innocent. It is, after all, the proper finding if there's doubt. The Dream Team and what looked like manufactured evidence provided the doubt. Marsha Clark didn't help. She did not come across well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2019, 12:43 PM
 
28,687 posts, read 18,825,363 times
Reputation: 31003
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinivanDriver View Post
When it comes to Simpson and Blake, you're comparing apples and oranges.



Well, for multiple reasons, race actually being the least of those. OJ Simpson remained a legit superstar in the eyes of the public. Stud running back. Actor. Sports commentator. The man was close to ubiquitous in the early 90s. OJ Simpson hired an all-star cast of attorneys who did their absolute best to hype this trial, and succeeded.



Robert Blake? A kind of washed-up B-level actor. Even when he was arrested and I remember thinking, "Who? Oh, wasn't he on kind of cop show? The one with the parrot in it?"

Which means that even when their money was equal, the black guy still needed many more advantages to get the same result as the white guy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2019, 12:38 PM
 
11,523 posts, read 14,670,985 times
Reputation: 16821
OJ's lived such an upstanding life since he got acquitted, too. Rolls eyes. If I can remember clearly, he served a bit of time there for another crime. This guy is bad news and yes he did murder his wife and RG. He was a wife batterer prior to all of that, too, with pictures and phone calls to prove it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2019, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
3,674 posts, read 3,038,706 times
Reputation: 5466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph_Kirk View Post
Which means that even when their money was equal, the black guy still needed many more advantages to get the same result as the white guy.
OJ had considerable more wealth that Blake. OJ was a worldwide beloved celeb, Blake was a C level at best. Race card declined. Cmon Ralph, you're better than THIS
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2019, 01:40 PM
 
28,687 posts, read 18,825,363 times
Reputation: 31003
Originally Posted by Ralph_Kirk
Which means that even when their money was equal, the black guy still needed many more advantages to get the same result as the white guy.


Quote:
Originally Posted by LeaveWI View Post
OJ had considerable more wealth that Blake. OJ was a worldwide beloved celeb, Blake was a C level at best. Race card declined. Cmon Ralph, you're better than THIS

You keep proving my point.


Yes, OJ had all kinds of advantages over Blake.


And wound up with no better legal outcome, and more hated.


If he hadn't had so many more advantages, he'd likely have been convicted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2019, 01:45 PM
 
4,345 posts, read 2,172,301 times
Reputation: 3398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wudge View Post
No Cookies | Herald Sun


Twenty years ago, this case was stupendous theatre all across the nation. Simply put, the case had everything: a beautiful and murdered wife, a former star NFL player and huge TV celebrity who was indicted for two murders, an unbelievable car chase that was broadcast live across the nation, a "Dream Team" for the defense, claims that blood evidence was planted by the L.A.P.D., a key detective and prosecution witness who took the 5th on the witness stand, and seemingly never ending claims of racial prejudice that were forever spouted by the media from the beginning of the case to long after the end of the trial.

Larry King (CNN) once said: "If we had God booked and O.J. was available, we'd move God."

As far as crimetainment goes, this was the ultimate dream case and trial.

In regards to whether or not someone in the L.A.P.D tried to frame O.J. Simpson, the fact that a blood preservative (EDTA) was found in some of the collected blood droppings from crime scene sites and that also matched O.J.'s DNA causes my position on a potential framing attempt to be: yes.

Many people have had 20 years to reflect on this incredible case and trial. What say you?


More case and trial background can be found here.

The Murder Trial of O.J. Simpson — Prologue — Crime Library


It's really simple.....if you're black he was framed.......
If you're white he's guilty as sin
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2019, 02:14 PM
 
28,687 posts, read 18,825,363 times
Reputation: 31003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vf6cruiser View Post
It's really simple.....if you're black he was framed.......
If you're white he's guilty as sin

Those are not mutually exclusive propositions.



The police tried to frame a guilty man.


Probably wasn't the first time for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2019, 03:40 PM
 
Location: Mammoth Lakes, CA
3,360 posts, read 8,395,298 times
Reputation: 8595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Ferris View Post
He was framed, and he was guilty. He hired killers, because he wasn't skillful enough to do it himself without getting caught.
How absurd. He did it himself, it takes no "skill" (just a sadistic brain) to practically decapitate Nicole and then bludgeon poor Ron to death. Obviously OJ did it, the victims blood was in his car and his DNA was found at the scene!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2019, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Coastal Mid-Atlantic
6,739 posts, read 4,427,709 times
Reputation: 8374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulysses61 View Post
How absurd. He did it himself, it takes no "skill" (just a sadistic brain) to practically decapitate Nicole and then bludgeon poor Ron to death. Obviously OJ did it, the victims blood was in his car and his DNA was found at the scene!

Oh yea he did it. His ego couldnt take losing her. He is the type that if he couldnt have her, nobody can have her, his brutality showed that. Ron was just there at the wrong time. Without the BS glove fiasco, he would of been found guilty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top