Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-10-2015, 07:56 AM
 
428 posts, read 344,156 times
Reputation: 256

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linda_d View Post
You reap what you sow. The Afrikaaners exploited and oppressed Africans for hundreds of years, and the culture they seek to preserve is based on racism. Spare me the "woe, the poor Afrikaaners" sob story.
Any more scores you want to settle? There's quite a few Jewish people left in Europe to deal with.

Truth is, most of the black people in SA aren't descended from the aboriginal people there.

It's an interesting problem, who gets the land? The original settlers (jeez, circa 500,000BC or so?), the tribes that were present when the Dutch showed up? Boers or English? Black tribes from the north?

The area has an interesting history, and is worth a read before pumping out some sort of kneejerk opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-10-2015, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,597,011 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tritone View Post
Some portuguese left and some didn't, and their descendents are still there.


Answer this question though:


Let's say you marry, are fruitful and multiply, have 5 children and 20 grandchildren, except those grandchildren are not white...did your numbers decline?

You could spin that either way.
Mozambique's white population has risen in recent years due to immigration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2015, 10:51 AM
 
3,850 posts, read 2,225,598 times
Reputation: 3128
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
Mozambique's white population has risen in recent years due to immigration.
It has in Angola too, but the immigration is pretty much only men who come for work, and they (the portuguese) have no aversion to the local Angolan women. They don't have the segregated culture that South Africans have. I've been to Luanda before (which was a good time) and I've never seen so many interracial couples; every white male had a black partner.

So sure they have a future in Africa, but as long as they're a small minority, they will naturally be absorbed/"decline" in number.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2015, 11:27 AM
 
16,578 posts, read 8,600,121 times
Reputation: 19400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tritone View Post
It depends on what you mean.

In many cases (Angola), they are "declining" only because they married locals and their descendents are black.
While that has undoubtedly happened on occasion, it hardly accounts for a majority of the white population being reduced to nothing. Instead it is either white flight, or forced exile. One need look no further than Zimbabwe for an example. The lunatic leader Mugabe decided to forcibly take white land and businesses, which leaves the people little choice. Heck the nutcase just mouthed off the other day about not wanting to see any white faces.

WATCH: I don't want to see a white face - Mugabe | News24

Don't think for a minute whites are not being burned out of their homes or even being killed by racist blacks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aunt Maude View Post
You are mostly referring to South Africa, no?
I'd say that they are doomed. At some point it's going to get ugly, and not just at the retail crime level.

Moderator cut: off topic

`

Last edited by Oldhag1; 04-10-2015 at 11:37 AM.. Reason: Bringing up partisan politics in a thread not specifically about that is always off topic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2015, 11:53 AM
 
2,540 posts, read 2,755,488 times
Reputation: 3891
Seeing what has become of sub-saharan Africa, why would any whites want to continue residing there? Clearly those countries are cesspools. There ought to be a program that would enable sub-saharan whites to obtain European citizenship based on their ancestry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2015, 12:59 PM
 
428 posts, read 344,156 times
Reputation: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linda_d View Post
Did the Jews rule Europe with an iron fist and exploit non-Jewish Europeans?
lol. I guess it depends on who you ask. I was hoping to more fully define the degree that you think it's OK to savage a population.

In your world, how abusive does a population need to be before it's OK to kill them indiscriminately and do the odd bit of raping and dismemberment to their families? It wasn't that long ago that the Apaches in southern Arizona used to sweep down into Mexico and kill/torture/steal cattle and the like, the townspeople were treated as a sort of prey animal. Would make it sense to send a few vigilantes out to the reservation and hang a few people?

To the people who aren't so quick to judge a people, the history of South Africa is really interesting and is worth a few books worth of reading. It might not change your mind about much of anything, but having a bit of knowledge is certainly better than not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2015, 02:37 PM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,581,120 times
Reputation: 16230
I'm not so sure it's a good thing for light-skinned people to be living so close to the equator, as the risk for skin cancer is very high in such situations, unless a lot of effort is put in to stay out of the sun. But who wants to live like that - being so limited and unable to do anything outdoors for much of the day?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2015, 02:46 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,597,011 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanCrossroads View Post
Seeing what has become of sub-saharan Africa, why would any whites want to continue residing there? Clearly those countries are cesspools. There ought to be a program that would enable sub-saharan whites to obtain European citizenship based on their ancestry.
There was exactly that for the French, Portuguese, and Brits (outside of South Africa). South Africa was a little different because it had full Dominion status, rather than being a colony like the rest of British Africa.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2015, 03:25 PM
 
7,578 posts, read 5,323,521 times
Reputation: 9447
Quote:
Originally Posted by AuburnAL View Post
I am not talking about expats as there will always be a few of them around. I refer instead to white citizens of African nations who are descendants of people that have been living in those countries for generations. Their populations have been declining since the beginning of decolonization. I was just wondering what others think.
There are 70 independent nations that might be described as "Sub-Saharan," so as to make anything other than a gross generalization highly unlikely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2015, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,597,011 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark1988 View Post
Unless there is a genocide (which is not unlikely, quite honestly) there will always be a prescense of Afrikaans people in South Africa. The vast majority of South Africans who leave are of British descent and are of relatively recent ancestry (post world war one). Afrikaans people have a very special connection to Africa having been there for 5 centuries and having developed a unique language and culture. Afrikaners tend to be very religious and have lots of children/marry young, and they basically never marry out of the white race. .
The Afrikaners were their own worst enemy - not mixing with the blacks, virulently opposing black rights, opposing immigration (because they saw other Europeans as being a threat to their culture), and supporting the National Party for decades, They refused to accept so called "Coloureds" (mixed race Afrikaners) as Afrikaners, despite having the same culture and customs. South Africa should have done the exact opposite of what it did and it would be in better shape now.

Last edited by majoun; 04-10-2015 at 06:04 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top