Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-26-2020, 06:28 PM
 
5,428 posts, read 3,497,292 times
Reputation: 5031

Advertisements

In the 1930's, rigid airships like theGraf Zeppelin and Hindenburg were making transatlantic crossings. At the time, they were faster than ocean liners and could cross the Atlantic in about 2 days, as opposed to the 5 needed by contemporary ships like Queen Mary. Fixed wing aircraft were not viable forms of public transportation yet, and it would take another two decades for them to really take off.
The R101 and Hindenburg disasters of 1930 and 1937 respectively, and the advances in airplane technology during WW2 essentially put an end to rigid airship development.

Ignoring airplanes, do you think rigid airships could compete with ocean liners in the long run? Other than speed, they weren't capable of transporting nearly as many passengers and were far less luxurious than a ship would be at the time.

https://www.airships.net/blog/hinden...n-mary-choose/

As a side note, I wanted to ask, whether there were any other airships besides Graf Zeppelin andHindenburg that crossed the Atlantic as passenger vessels?

P.S. I just realized I posted this in Great Debates, when I meant for it to be under History. Mods feel free to move it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-04-2020, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Howard County, Maryland
16,556 posts, read 10,630,149 times
Reputation: 36573
Not sure why the mods haven't moved this to History yet. But to answer the question, no, I don't think that airships were ever a viable competitor to ocean liners. It's all about economies of scale. An ocean liner could transport maybe 3,000 passengers, whereas an airship could carry, what, maybe 50? There's no way that airships could have ever been more than niche players in the trans-Atlantic passenger trade, even if the R-101 and Hindenburg had never crashed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2020, 11:11 AM
 
12,847 posts, read 9,055,079 times
Reputation: 34940
If you look at it, they really weren't competing with ocean liners. Totally different market. In a way they were like a very early version of FedExing people. Ocean liners moved mass numbers of people at an economic rate across the ocean. Much like the large container ships of today. Airships moved a few people, fast, for a much higher cost. Like today the airplane carries that envelope across the ocean overnight, but you pay a premium for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2020, 11:21 AM
 
5,168 posts, read 3,088,896 times
Reputation: 11050
Almost all of the rigid airships were lost to bad weather incidents. Not enough safety even for military use, although rumors circulate that the special forces have lighter than air systems for infiltration missions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2020, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Tampa (by way of Omaha)
14,561 posts, read 23,071,179 times
Reputation: 10356
The Hindenburg pretty much ended the viability of the hydrogen filled rigid airship as passenger transport, and rightfully so. They were incredibly dangerous, fragile, not particularly easy to pilot and pretty much could not fly through inclement weather.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2020, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,544,683 times
Reputation: 24780
Default Do you think rigid airships were a viable competitor to ocean liners?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milky Way Resident View Post
In the 1930's, rigid airships like theGraf Zeppelin and Hindenburg were making transatlantic crossings. At the time, they were faster than ocean liners and could cross the Atlantic in about 2 days, as opposed to the 5 needed by contemporary ships like Queen Mary. Fixed wing aircraft were not viable forms of public transportation yet, and it would take another two decades for them to really take off.
The R101 and Hindenburg disasters of 1930 and 1937 respectively, and the advances in airplane technology during WW2 essentially put an end to rigid airship development.

Ignoring airplanes, do you think rigid airships could compete with ocean liners in the long run? Other than speed, they weren't capable of transporting nearly as many passengers and were far less luxurious than a ship would be at the time.

https://www.airships.net/blog/hinden...n-mary-choose/

As a side note, I wanted to ask, whether there were any other airships besides Graf Zeppelin andHindenburg that crossed the Atlantic as passenger vessels?

P.S. I just realized I posted this in Great Debates, when I meant for it to be under History. Mods feel free to move it.

Clearly, the economic forces decided this question nearly 90 years ago.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2020, 04:44 PM
 
15,590 posts, read 15,677,065 times
Reputation: 21999
They were apparently very successful, and the only reason that they died off was due to the Hindenburg disaster.

Hey, maybe Aviation instead of History.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2020, 11:53 PM
 
3,697 posts, read 4,998,064 times
Reputation: 2075
It is a bit more complicated than that as there was a third option. Airships are in a sense were the first powered aircraft and rigid Airships predate the blimp and as well as the plane. It was becoming outdated technology by the time of the Hindenburg. Airships in Germany ushered in the first regularly scheduled passenger air transports before WWI and during WWI bombed London. They even were the first type of Aircraft to go around the world non stop! Airships had the advantage of range over planes but planes were faster. However, airplane technology was improving. In the 1930ies planes were a viable form of transportation with some limitations. Also, Germany really was the only country to safely and practically operate airships in a passenger service.


By the time of Hindenburg (1937), you could fly across the Pacific using seaplanes (1934) and Atlantic service was just a few years from starting (1939). The reason for the lack of transatlantic sea plane service is two fold, the U.K. would not allow a foreign carrier (Pan AM) to land in the U.K without it’s own transatlantic seaplane service. There were also more countries that needed to be negotiated with as opposed to the Pacific Route that used territories of the United States. An airship could simply use it's range to skip this problem in the Atlantic and there were plans for Airships capable of the Pacific.

Using a sea plane, to get from L.A. to Manilla (where you would board a boat to Hong Kong), you made overnight stops in Hawaii, Midway island, Wake, and Guam. At these stops the passengers would spend the night at a hotel\resort and then board a plane for the next hop. This trip took about 6 days but cut weeks off vs. an ocean linear. The reason why seaplanes were used was because of lack of runways, a sea plane can use the same harbor facilities as a boat. The sea plane would also refuel at theses stops with the fuel being shipped in by boat.

The Atlantic trip departed from Baltimore, stopped in Horta, Lisbon and finally Marseilles, France. Later that same year (1939) service to the U.K. departing from New York was started with stops in New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Foynes, Ireland to South Hampton. This route took two days but offered more stops(where you could pick up and depart more passengers\cargo) than Hindenburg's three day non stop flight from Germany. From France you could board a train or take a plane to Germany and from the U.K. you could fly to Germany in hours.

Seaplanes are both faster and need less personal to operate making them more economical than Airships(the only reason why the route took 2 days was due to limited range). The outbreak of WWII as well as the disaster(airships had crashed and caught fire before but that was the first time it had been caught on film and broadcasted live on radio) was what doomed the airships. They offered no advantage of cost vs. Sea Plane or Ocean liner nor speed vs. sea plane. Round trip on Hindenburg was $700 vs. $675 for the sea plane.


WWII improvements in Airplanes (faster and longer range) and more runways around the world made seaplanes obsolete for crossing oceans and over time even the Ocean liner would not be able to compete with the plane.

Last edited by chirack; 05-12-2020 at 12:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2020, 12:23 AM
 
3,697 posts, read 4,998,064 times
Reputation: 2075
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimAZ View Post
Almost all of the rigid airships were lost to bad weather incidents. Not enough safety even for military use, although rumors circulate that the special forces have lighter than air systems for infiltration missions.
In WII and until the 50ies blimps(as opposed to airships) were used by the U.S. Navy for Search and rescue, spotting targets for ship's Guns, and anti submarine patrols. Improvements in technology and other aircraft(helicopters) took on these roles. The blimp's ballon could be deflated for storage on a ship and it could stay up in the air almost stationary in an area for hours.

Last edited by chirack; 05-12-2020 at 12:36 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2020, 01:34 PM
 
Location: San Diego CA
8,488 posts, read 6,891,592 times
Reputation: 17023
Well airships planned to compete with ocean liners. The mast on the Empire State Building, now used for communications, was originally built as a docking device for trans Atlantic airships. The only problem was that cross winds blowing across Manhattan made exiting and entering perilous to say the least. Large passenger carrying airships are so fragile to the elements that they are impractical and downright dangerous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top