Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-01-2021, 07:31 PM
 
5,527 posts, read 3,274,906 times
Reputation: 7764

Advertisements

Graduate programs throughout the world are faced with a paradox.

There are more candidates than ever ready and willing to do research. And yet, research productivity is declining.

There could be many reasons for these facts, some indicating a need for reform and some not.

On the needs reform side:

There is a bolus of older professors recruited during the 60s and 70s who have aged out of their productive years and are taking up research dollars and tenured positions. "Science advances one funeral at a time." This is a solvable problem through reform.

High impact research follows a power law distribution, with a small number of researchers generating most meaningful research. Graduate schools are casting too wide a net and recruiting those who have no business attempting a career in research. How did graduate schools before the 1960s identify high impact researchers from a smaller pool of candidates? Why are we unable to filter out low impact researchers earlier?

On the does not need reform side:

Research is actually doing fine. Fields like CS and biology are making great strides because they are tilling fertile soil. Other fields like particle physics and aeronautical engineering are tilling exhausted soil. The humanities are worse; there is nothing more to say about most creative works. There is no quick way to rejuvenate these fields; we just have to wait for oddball breakthroughs to open new frontiers. Reform won't change anything. We have to surf the wave of discovery that the universe provides us. And the best way to be prepared for new discoveries is going through a PhD program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-02-2021, 10:11 AM
 
2,289 posts, read 1,578,799 times
Reputation: 1800
Two sentences in the OP caught my attention.

1: And yet, research productivity is declining.

2: Research is actually doing fine.

Can you cite any authority to support both of those sentences?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2021, 11:44 AM
 
5,527 posts, read 3,274,906 times
Reputation: 7764
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Very Man Himself View Post
Two sentences in the OP caught my attention.

1: And yet, research productivity is declining.

2: Research is actually doing fine.

Can you cite any authority to support both of those sentences?
1. This article gives an overview of scholarly articles on the subject. https://sapienjournal.org/research-p...ced-economies/

2. Research is doing fine in some fields, indicating that nothing is broken about the research enterprise. Declining research productivity on the whole is due to newer ideas becoming harder to discover in most fields, due to the maturity of those fields. But in those fields that are less mature, research is proceeding as in the past. I don't have any citation, but it's a concensus that biology in particular is in a golden age, while CS while in a not-as-revolutionary time is still making solid gains.

1 is a fact, 2 is a potential explanation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-02-2021, 12:15 PM
 
2,289 posts, read 1,578,799 times
Reputation: 1800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avondalist View Post
1. This article gives an overview of scholarly articles on the subject. https://sapienjournal.org/research-p...ced-economies/

2. Research is doing fine in some fields, indicating that nothing is broken about the research enterprise. Declining research productivity on the whole is due to newer ideas becoming harder to discover in most fields, due to the maturity of those fields. But in those fields that are less mature, research is proceeding as in the past. I don't have any citation, but it's a concensus that biology in particular is in a golden age, while CS while in a not-as-revolutionary time is still making solid gains.

1 is a fact, 2 is a potential explanation.
Decreasing marginal return in mature fields is nothing new. That makes it harder to obtain academic grants, and the private sector has different evaluation criteria.

Quote:
Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?†
By Nicholas Bloom, Charles I. Jones, John Van Reenen,
and Michael Webb*
Long-run growth in many models is the product of two terms: the
effective number of researchers and their research productivity. We
present evidence from various industries, products, and firms showing that research effort is rising substantially while research productivity is declining sharply. A good example is Moore’s Law. The
number of researchers required today to achieve the famous doubling of computer chip density is more than 18 times larger than the number required in the early 1970s.
More generally, everywhere we
look we find that ideas, and the exponential growth they imply, are
getting harder to find. (JEL D24, E23, O31, O47)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top