Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-23-2010, 11:20 AM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,747 posts, read 18,818,821 times
Reputation: 22590

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicIsYourFriend View Post
You said you wouldn't provide anyone with garbage. Fast food provides people with garbage. McDonald's doesn't offer heroin, but it is more comparable than you think.

If a person only used heroin as much as you eat hamburgers, then that person would be perfectly healthy.

On the other hand, a person eating hamburgers as much as your hypothetical junkie, that person would have noticeable physical ailments as well. As I'm sure you know, fast food causes tremendous health hazards. The only thing missing is the withdrawal symptoms.
But... I know many fat slobs who hold down jobs and are productive. I've never known an addicted junkie to hold down much of anything. The only time that has ever happened is if the person is some sort of mega rich starlet or something. She has so much money, she can get her goods every day. Most have blown most all of their fortunes doing it. For the typical person, it's, if not a death sentence, at least a sentence to a horrible life.

Seriously, I have a cousin who has to weight at least 400 lbs. He drove a truck for a bread company. The guy would stop at every burger joint along his route all day every day. Did it for years. Now he's retired and although really obese, still functioning a fairly normal life. Do you think that would have worked out for him the same had he been hooked on heroin? No way. Within a few months, has paycheck wouldn't have covered his addiction and he'd have lost his job. As it is, he's certainly got a higher chance of keeling over with a sudden heart attack, but he's not a whacked out, stuttering, trembling freak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-23-2010, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,992,173 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC View Post
Nope. I have worked as a cook at steakhouse, though. We didn't offer heroin on the menu; I'd doubt if McDonalds does either. Seriously, if you equate eating a greasy hamburger with shooting up with heroin on the 'dangers to the body and mind' list, you should work on that logic a bit. .
The McDonalds reference did not arise with reference to heroin, but in response this this comment of yours:


Besides, I don't view the body as a chemistry experiment--it has its own extremely complex chemical processes. Throwing garbage into the system will only result in getting garbage in return. I certainly don't want to be responsible for throwing garbage into someone else's system. If they want to do that to themselves, so be it. But it won't be coming from me.



as for this----
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC View Post
But... I know many fat slobs who hold down jobs and are productive. I've never known an addicted junkie to hold down much of anything. .
. . . a pretty high proportion of workers on oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico spend nearly all their shore time zoned out on pot, and usually meth as well. I know one whose sister owns a meth lab. How many of them take their addiction out to the rig with them, I have no idea. But they make so much money, they can afford any drug.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2010, 11:25 AM
NCN
 
Location: NC/SC Border Patrol
21,663 posts, read 25,634,295 times
Reputation: 24375
Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkin about it View Post
by fellow dealers? You're in some sort of situation wherein you are protected by a shady government and underworld ties. It's utterly safe from the perspective of personal physical risk; your involvement will give thousands of people more access to heroin.


Would you do it? Please only respond if you feel like explaining and defending your choice. It's the debate section, after all.
No. It is illegal whether you were to be caught or not. People who live beyond the law are uncivilized. How many law enforcement people would we need to control a society that only does right if they are afraid of being caught. We could lower taxes if people who live uncivilized lives like this would change their ways and decide to live right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2010, 11:28 AM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,747 posts, read 18,818,821 times
Reputation: 22590
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
The McDonalds reference did not arise with reference to heroin, but in response this this comment of yours:


Besides, I don't view the body as a chemistry experiment--it has its own extremely complex chemical processes. Throwing garbage into the system will only result in getting garbage in return. I certainly don't want to be responsible for throwing garbage into someone else's system. If they want to do that to themselves, so be it. But it won't be coming from me.
Yes, I know McDonalds doles out garbage. But, let's not equate heroin with a burger. They may both be garbage, but I'm going to insist here that heroin is more dangerous than a burger for many reasons. I'm going to assume that statistics would back this up. To imply otherwise, is in my opinion quite ludicrous. As I've mentioned before, I've seen quite a number of drug and alcohol basket cases. Yes, I've seen some heart attacks due to bad eating habits, but those people (that I've known) led productive lives until they met their end. That's seldom the case with a drug addict.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
as for this----

. . . a pretty high proportion of workers on oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico spend nearly all their shore time zoned out on pot, and usually meth as well. I know one whose sister owns a meth lab. How many of them take their addiction out to the rig with them, I have no idea. But they make so much money, they can afford any drug.
And you've never seen a fat construction worker with the dreaded 'plumber's crack' (his ass is showing)?





If you want to equate heroin to hamburgers, that is your prerogative. But I know you're smarter than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2010, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,992,173 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCN View Post
People who live beyond the law are uncivilized.
"Everything Hitler did was legal. Everything the Hungarian Freedom Fighters did was illegal." ---Nelson Mandela (one of those uncivilized people who lived beyond the law)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,019,978 times
Reputation: 62204
No, I'm not a people person. I hate selling stuff/asking people for money and always have since I was a kid. I don't want to deal with the stupid public that does heroin. I can't imagine a smart business person cultivating a clientele of customers with short life spans, either. How do you get out of bed and fake it every day if you think they're all jerks?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 07:42 PM
 
768 posts, read 942,943 times
Reputation: 608
fwiw, I would tomorrow.


The country wasn't built on "Protestant work ethic," as the cliche' goes. This country was built on the same principle that every other country, tribe and nation was built on in the course of human history: The strong taking advantage of the weak.

It's a necessary part of civilization, and happens in less obvious ways all around us. I don't even feel it necessary to delve into the moral hypocrisy of working for XYZ Corp who does XYZ awful thing(most of them) while rejected heroin dealing on moral grounds. That's a secondary aside.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 08:05 PM
 
Location: On a Slow-Sinking Granite Rock Up North
3,638 posts, read 6,169,592 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkin about it View Post
fwiw, I would tomorrow.


The country wasn't built on "Protestant work ethic," as the cliche' goes. This country was built on the same principle that every other country, tribe and nation was built on in the course of human history: The strong taking advantage of the weak.

It's a necessary part of civilization, and happens in less obvious ways all around us. I don't even feel it necessary to delve into the moral hypocrisy of working for XYZ Corp who does XYZ awful thing(most of them) while rejected heroin dealing on moral grounds. That's a secondary aside.
Okay, but let us not hear any griping about "welfare cheats" who "suck off the teat of public money" because they are "lazy drug-addicted, garbage." That - in a nutshell - is the single biggest hypocrisy there is IMHO. I see so many judgemental people who live in glass houses while hurling stones, and I frankly find it pathetic.

Personally, I wouldn't no matter whether I were to get caught or not. I have what is called a "conscience" and that "conscience" (which by the way is pretty agnostic in general) won't allow me to profit from others absolute demise. I'd feel the same way working for legal drug pushers (since let's face it, the grand secret - well, except maybe to Rush Limbaugh anyway) is that prescription opiate drug abuse is even worse than what the average corner addict shoots up (IMHO) mainly because it's very insidious indeed. This is especially true if you've got sufficient cash to see doctors who will prescribe even more of this crap. It's much easier to hide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2010, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
Let us just take the illegality out of the system and have the market set the availability and price along with a minimal tax to fund a recovery system. That way the junkies that could continue to function would do so, the ones that wanted to quit would get help and the suicides would die. This is tough, but not as tough or costly as the current mess because, among other things, there would be no monopoly criminal profit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 05:53 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,867,563 times
Reputation: 18304
No. I wouldn;t even allow the government to promote and tax such things that destroy so many lifes.I would fight to prevent such a government policy that allows this and profits but it in revenues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top