Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is my favorite of the disaster porn I have read and would make an awesome movie:
"The government lowers a nuclear device into the damaged wellhead and detonates it. The large undersea oil pocket contains a high degree of explosive vapor and an area approximately 20,000 square miles suddenly explodes at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, like detonating a large firecracker inside a watermelon. After the resulting tidal waves destroy our coast as far inland as Dallas, Atlanta, and Tulsa, the large chasm blown in the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico begins draining the ocean down into deeper chasms in the Earth. Within a decade, half of the world's oceans have now dried up and steam resulting in the water's contact with molten magma covers the skies, ushering in a new global warming scenario that over the next 300 years turns the Earth into Venus."
Then what is a good source for this info? One might as well delete this thread rather than attack the source in this manner.
I think it's valid that if an author has a history of writing article after article that turns out to be doomsday hyperbole based on weak science that they've established their reputation and that pointing it out is not attacking the source.
Heck, we have a few posters around here that post numerous famine, financial meltdown, earth destroyed type scenarios over and over and over.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.