Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-30-2018, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
16,569 posts, read 15,268,500 times
Reputation: 14590

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
The stone age didn't end because we ran short of rocks. Oil based economies are 20th century technology. Time to move on.
You think you are making a point but you are doing the opposite. The reason people retired their coal furnaces and switched to natural gas was not because we ran out of coal. It was because natural gas made sense without the government putting its thumb on the scale. When "alternate" fuels make sense people adopt. It has nothing to do with what century we are in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-30-2018, 08:34 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,705 posts, read 58,031,425 times
Reputation: 46172
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyRider View Post
You think you are making a point but you are doing the opposite. The reason people retired their coal furnaces and switched to natural gas was not because we ran out of coal. It was because natural gas made sense without the government putting its thumb on the scale. When "alternate" fuels make sense people adopt. It has nothing to do with what century we are in.
now for the real question...

"government putting its thumb on the scale" seems to have been a bad habit for USA Alternative power adoption and technology (to a point).

But... economically power options are still too cheap to warrant investment in alternatives (in USA)
No economic incentive. +/-

The positive thing about that...
1) Newer technologies will aid in replacement options
2) the science can respond fairly quickly
3) artificial economics is not sustainable (government subsidies and mandates)

The negative thing:
1) infrastructure cannot respond very quickly to swapping OUT conventional petrol stations.
2) Pain / inconvenience (and potentially national security) will suffer
3) Odd man OUT... there may come a time when you must PAY (the gov) to Play (to get fuel resources)
4) risk of social unrest. (unlikely in the passive USA, but if people get HUNGRY, or someone cuts off their TV... Watch OUT!)

This discussion is NOT very accepting of a 'discussion' ((mis) guided censoring)

So... it is very shallow / void of reasonable options or opinions.

Quite sad.

Could be a valuable subject with lots of GREAT feedback.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2018, 10:16 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,039,086 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyRider View Post
You think you are making a point but you are doing the opposite. The reason people retired their coal furnaces and switched to natural gas was not because we ran out of coal. It was because natural gas made sense without the government putting its thumb on the scale. When "alternate" fuels make sense people adopt. It has nothing to do with what century we are in.

The peak of anthracite production was around 1920, it was replaced with oil which is still widely used in the Northeast for home heating. The reason is simple, it was convenient and the price was right at the time. Natural gas only recently became competitive with anthracite, 10 years ago it would of been 2 or 3 times the cost. It's only marginally more expensive now.



The market for anthracite is now areas that do not have access to piped gas. Ironically usually to replace oil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2018, 12:15 AM
 
7,654 posts, read 5,113,409 times
Reputation: 5036
I would love to ban diesel trucks, if you have even been behind a bull dog lifted F-650 super duty its nasty. Black smoke and you have to roll all your windows up and turn on air recycle before it gets too close.

I dont need a PhD thesis to know these trucks are nasty and need to go.

I dont know how they will do it with Semi's but relegating them to certian routes at certian times would be wonderful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2018, 03:57 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,989,918 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyRider View Post
You think you are making a point but you are doing the opposite. The reason people retired their coal furnaces and switched to natural gas was not because we ran out of coal. It was because natural gas made sense without the government putting its thumb on the scale. When "alternate" fuels make sense people adopt. It has nothing to do with what century we are in.
Without the American military over in the Middle East how much do you think oil would cost? That's paid for by your taxes and far exceeds any government thumb on the scale of renewable energy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2018, 05:23 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,039,086 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by pittsflyer View Post
I would love to ban diesel trucks, if you have even been behind a bull dog lifted F-650 super duty its nasty. Black smoke and you have to roll all your windows up and turn on air recycle before it gets too close.

That is mostly due to modifications they have made for performance and I'd agree they shouldn't be allowed on the road in that state.


Quote:
I dont know how they will do it with Semi's but relegating them to certian routes at certian times would be wonderful.
Prepared to pay more for goods at the store?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2018, 06:40 AM
 
Location: The Driftless Area, WI
7,253 posts, read 5,126,001 times
Reputation: 17747
Quote:
Originally Posted by pittsflyer View Post
. Black smoke and you have to roll all your windows up and turn on air recycle before it gets too close.

I dont need a PhD thesis to know these trucks are nasty and need to go.

.

Or you could just not tailgate- simple solution to a minor problem. Getting rid of diesel trucks would mean higher shipping costs--> more expensive goods--> lower demand--> lower production-->fewer jobs--> repeat cycle. Roll up your windows and save us from another depression



All technological solutions are a compromise among conflicting factors meant to reach an optimum state balancing risks vs benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2018, 06:49 AM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
16,569 posts, read 15,268,500 times
Reputation: 14590
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Without the American military over in the Middle East how much do you think oil would cost?
Umm, $30 a barrel? Saudi Arabia could be taken over by Islamists tomorrow and they still need to sell their oil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2018, 07:11 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,039,086 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by guidoLaMoto View Post
Or you could just not tailgate-

What the poster is likely referring to is a truck that has been modified for higher performance. You can be two blocks behind it and still be driving through a thick cloud of smoke, that is not an exaggeration. I'm a live and let live kind of guy but I have my limits. It's an unnecessary nuisance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2018, 07:38 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,989,918 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyRider View Post
Umm, $30 a barrel? Saudi Arabia could be taken over by Islamists tomorrow and they still need to sell their oil.
You seem woefully naive about the stability of the Middle East.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top