Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-01-2009, 07:59 PM
 
354 posts, read 855,485 times
Reputation: 307

Advertisements

I have read some things about a proposed ethanol pipeline to NYC that will make it the first large market for ethanol. The pipeline is suppoused to run throgh Pennsylvania and that is why their is a huge ethanol plant being built in Clearfield Pa. Does anyone know any details?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2009, 09:44 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865
AFAIK they can't use pipelines for ethanol as it corrodes them very fast, That's one of the issues with it, all the product needs to be trucked.

Found a document for building a natural gas pipeline to the plant:


http://www.bionolpipelineproject.info/index.php


--------------

So here's a question.... why not use the ethanol to produce heat? Pretty sure I know the answer but I'll leave it at that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 05:31 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
Would the ethanol be distributed to the few gas stations in NYC or many the bars?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 06:38 AM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,681,928 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddmhughes View Post
I have read some things about a proposed ethanol pipeline to NYC that will make it the first large market for ethanol. The pipeline is suppoused to run throgh Pennsylvania and that is why their is a huge ethanol plant being built in Clearfield Pa. Does anyone know any details?
I think it's a myth.

From everything I've read, ethanol production cannot keep up with the demand that is already "out there." In addition, there have been a lot of ethanol plants close down, due to the price of corn hitting $7+ per bushel last summer, and the ensuing financial problems.

So I really cannot see how/why there would be an ethanol pipeline into NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2009, 07:30 AM
 
9,803 posts, read 16,194,504 times
Reputation: 8266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaha Rocks View Post
I think it's a myth.

From everything I've read, ethanol production cannot keep up with the demand that is already "out there." In addition, there have been a lot of ethanol plants close down, due to the price of corn hitting $7+ per bushel last summer, and the ensuing financial problems.

So I really cannot see how/why there would be an ethanol pipeline into NYC.
Yup, when corn was sky high, all the alarmists blamed the ethanol industry for being the culprit for high food prices.

Corn price has tumbled ( some area elevators were paying under $3 a bushel yesterday.) Farm prices,overall, have tumbled.

Not much in the news now about the connection between ethanol and high food prices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2009, 05:48 PM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,705,555 times
Reputation: 37905
Using corn for Ethanol is idiotic anyway. Use switch grass or another alternative non-food plant.

Nothing on Snopes about it...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2009, 06:38 PM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,681,928 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tek_Freek View Post
Using corn for Ethanol is idiotic anyway. Use switch grass or another alternative non-food plant.

Nothing on Snopes about it...
No, using corn for ethanol is not idiotic. What most people don't understand is that the corn is still used as feed after it is processed for ethanol.

So let's continue to use corn for ethanol production. But let's broaden it out, and use sugar beets, cane sugar, switch grass, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2009, 06:59 PM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,705,555 times
Reputation: 37905
It is idiotic simply because of the costs involved, among other factors. Whether or not is used for feed after the processing is done is irrelevant. If it was cost effective we wouldn't be seeing all the plants we gave our tax dollars to going out of business. That pisses me off.

Any way you look at it growing corn is a fuel intensive, market sensitive, high fertilization concern.

I would rather see switch grass or another alternative as the main source with corn as a backup when market prices are reasonable (if ever compared to something like switch grass). Switch grass requires NO fertilizer, grows densely (how far apart does your corn have to be planted?), does not suffer overly in a drought (and your corns does what without the required minimum of rainfall?), will suffer too much water (again, how does your corn handle an overly wet year?) and the area in which it can be easily grown in the US is far wider than corn.

If the amount of research and money plowed into corn produced ethanol was given to switch grass then switch grass would be the predominate ethanol producer in this country. Of course that effort is hindered by farmers and their representatives.

In addition I would welcome some relief from all the crap dumped into the rivers here because of farming practices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2009, 07:47 PM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,681,928 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tek_Freek View Post
It is idiotic simply because of the costs involved, among other factors. Whether or not is used for feed after the processing is done is irrelevant. If it was cost effective we wouldn't be seeing all the plants we gave our tax dollars to going out of business. That pisses me off.

Any way you look at it growing corn is a fuel intensive, market sensitive, high fertilization concern.

I would rather see switch grass or another alternative as the main source with corn as a backup when market prices are reasonable (if ever compared to something like switch grass). Switch grass requires NO fertilizer, grows densely (how far apart does your corn have to be planted?), does not suffer overly in a drought (and your corns does what without the required minimum of rainfall?), will suffer too much water (again, how does your corn handle an overly wet year?) and the area in which it can be easily grown in the US is far wider than corn.

If the amount of research and money plowed into corn produced ethanol was given to switch grass then switch grass would be the predominate ethanol producer in this country. Of course that effort is hindered by farmers and their representatives.

In addition I would welcome some relief from all the crap dumped into the rivers here because of farming practices.

First of all, the reason Switchgrass is not commonly used for ethanol production is that, unlike corn, it does not have the simple sugars that can easily be extracted and fermented for alcohol production. It requires an extra step - a very complicated step - in the process of producing ethanol from Switchgrass.

It is very likely that technology will eventually make it feasible to use Switchgrass for ethanol production. But that technology is not currently available.


Moderator cut: No flaming

Last edited by vec101; 07-04-2009 at 06:32 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2009, 08:24 PM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,705,555 times
Reputation: 37905
Moderator cut: No flaming

Moderator cut: No flaming
I specifically mentioned the amount of research and money that has been invested in the effort to make corn the ethanol choice instead of other resources (notably switch grass)
Moderator cut: No flaming
so you would not have had to bring up the point of the extraction being more difficult, since I had already talked about it, albeit in passing.

Moderator cut: No flaming
The loss of tax dollars is a fact as is the amount of pollutants introduced into our rivers by over-fertilization of fields in the effort to grow more corn. That's not an axe, that's a fact.

Moderator cut: No flaming

Last edited by vec101; 07-04-2009 at 06:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top