Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think it's interesting that they had to completely shut down one direction of 385 a couple of years ago in order to do concrete (further down toward Newberry), but they're somehow able to keep both directions open closer to Greenville.
I think it's interesting that they had to completely shut down one direction of 385 a couple of years ago in order to do concrete (further down toward Newberry), but they're somehow able to keep both directions open closer to Greenville.
Very. Interesting. Indeed.
Was that section done quicker? I thought that was the idea behind closing it down. Plus it is way less congested and less traffic.
I think it's interesting that they had to completely shut down one direction of 385 a couple of years ago in order to do concrete (further down toward Newberry), but they're somehow able to keep both directions open closer to Greenville.
Very. Interesting. Indeed.
Yes, it was done much more quickly and is less congested.
I think it's interesting that they had to completely shut down one direction of 385 a couple of years ago in order to do concrete (further down toward Newberry), but they're somehow able to keep both directions open closer to Greenville.
Very. Interesting. Indeed.
My brother works for the SCDOT and had to attend a meeting in Columbia. He came up here to visit in July and noticed the 385 work going on and was saying how in the meeting that he attended, they were discussing the I-385 construction and how they were trying something new here with working from the middle of the interstate to keep both directions open. If it's successful they will use this method elsewhere.
1 and 1B look like they are adding an exit past Woodruff at Salter's Road or what exactly is going on there...?
Alternatives 1 and 1B is to provide access from I-85 to Woodruff Road in a new location. Side roads would be taken to access Woodruff Road.
The idea of eliminating I-85 access to Woodruff Road was dismissed. Business dependent on interstate traffic feared losing business with that interchange closed.
I think a better alternatvie to I-85 and Woodruff Road is a connector road that Ys into I-85, similar to Brockman McClimon Road at I-85, exit 58.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
