Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-21-2012, 10:54 AM
 
1,721 posts, read 1,520,199 times
Reputation: 1133

Advertisements

The year 2012 was supposed to bring us: flying cars, jet packs, moon colonies, fusion, Robots, and food pills. All we got was: The Internet, Cell Phones, The Burj Kalifa, A Mars Rover landing, a african american president, the International Space Station, and so on.

Who here finds the year 2012 to be a very disappointing year to all those people who remember the 60s or 50s?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-21-2012, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,253,676 times
Reputation: 6920
I didn't imagine that when I first flew on 737s and 747s in the early 1970s that 40 years later those planes would still be in use, considering what people were flying in 40 years before that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2012, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,329 posts, read 93,761,592 times
Reputation: 17831
We didn't get nuked.
We aren't all speaking Russian.

I do miss the 70s though. In one sense it was a "sweet spot", a perfect time in history: after The Pill and before AIDS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2012, 06:32 PM
 
1,446 posts, read 4,597,806 times
Reputation: 991
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
I didn't imagine that when I first flew on 737s and 747s in the early 1970s that 40 years later those planes would still be in use, considering what people were flying in 40 years before that.
However, these 737s and 747s that we are still using are MUCH safer than in the early 1970's. Just because a form of technology is not completely new, does not mean it has not been greatly improved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2012, 06:39 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,253,676 times
Reputation: 6920
Quote:
Originally Posted by lentzr View Post
However, these 737s and 747s that we are still using are MUCH safer than in the early 1970's. Just because a form of technology is not completely new, does not mean it has not been greatly improved.
Actually I liked the 747s from the 70s much better. On the one I was on the upstairs was a piano bar (on a domestic flight no less) whereas now it's just first class seats.

I'm sure the odds of being killed in an air accident back in the 70s was a fraction what it is driving a car now.

Last edited by CAVA1990; 10-21-2012 at 06:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2012, 07:05 PM
 
1,446 posts, read 4,597,806 times
Reputation: 991
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
Actually I liked the 747s from the 70s much better. On the one I was on the upstairs was a piano bar (on a domestic flight no less) whereas now it's just first class seats.

I'm sure the odds of being killed in an air accident back in the 70s was a fraction what it is driving a car now.
I was comparing airplanes of 1972 to airplanes of 2012.

Secondly, the automobile accident rate of 1972 was much higher than in 2012.

Let's not compare apples to oranges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2012, 07:32 PM
 
7,072 posts, read 9,619,168 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by STB93 View Post
The year 2012 was supposed to bring us: flying cars, jet packs, moon colonies, fusion, Robots, and food pills. All we got was: The Internet, Cell Phones, The Burj Kalifa, A Mars Rover landing, a african american president, the International Space Station, and so on.

Who here finds the year 2012 to be a very disappointing year to all those people who remember the 60s or 50s?

And robots were supposed to be doing all of our work, so we could sit home and enjoy the good life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2012, 07:38 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,815,703 times
Reputation: 14116
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram2 View Post
And robots were supposed to be doing all of our work, so we could sit home and enjoy the good life.
It's funny that old school futurists never stopped to realize automation would really result in people with no jobs and no money to spend... not exactly the good life.

Nor that 3rd world and illegal immigrant labor would be more than a little cheaper than building dexterous semi-intelligent robots capable of doing such work.

For all our technological advances we really haven't come far at all, have we?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2012, 08:53 PM
 
23,601 posts, read 70,412,676 times
Reputation: 49275
Quote:
Originally Posted by STB93 View Post
The year 2012 was supposed to bring us: flying cars, jet packs, moon colonies, fusion, Robots, and food pills. All we got was: The Internet, Cell Phones, The Burj Kalifa, A Mars Rover landing, a african american president, the International Space Station, and so on.

Who here finds the year 2012 to be a very disappointing year to all those people who remember the 60s or 50s?
Flying cars are a no go because of safety, privacy and noise issues. Snowmobiles and ATVs are bad enough. Jet packs were never really considered to be practical. I did somewhat expect a lagrange point station and moon base. Rossums universal robots are a little ways down the road, but we'll get there.

Where we haven't made progress is sociology, government, and interpersonal issues. Oh yeah, alternative power to oil and coal based power has been disappointing. Cheap energy and real education could make this a dynamic world. What concerns me most is the possibility of a uniculture due to globalization.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2012, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
I'd say the whole 21st Century is pretty much of a dud, even viewed by 1999 expectations, but then, I don't live in China, where I think most people are pretty happy about it, and maybe the rest of the developing world, too. I bet most Iraqis would like to have 1999 back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top