Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-18-2014, 12:43 PM
 
Location: USA
234 posts, read 220,047 times
Reputation: 88

Advertisements

My friend said it was the Germans that ended the Roman Empire. I tried researching and there is too many stories out there. Does anyone really know. I just want to know which country that did it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2014, 12:44 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
the roman army was for the first time defeated by the german calvary.
it would not be the only time the romans would lose but it was the turning point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 01:38 PM
 
Location: City of North Las Vegas, NV
12,600 posts, read 9,390,917 times
Reputation: 3487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
the roman army was for the first time defeated by the german calvary.
it would not be the only time the romans would lose but it was the turning point.
there was not Germany then. In general it was said that the western Roman empire (Rome) fell to the "barbarians"/Visigoths or just Goths from the north. The eastern Roman empire (Constantinople) fell much later to the Turks.

Last edited by WildWestDude; 10-18-2014 at 01:49 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 02:06 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildWestDude View Post
there was not Germany then. In general it was said that the western Roman empire (Rome) fell to the "barbarians"/Visigoths or just Goths from the north. The eastern Roman empire (Constantinople) fell much later to the Turks.
perhaps not in the modern sense but all historians agree who they were in most common geographic terms
germany


Battle of the Teutoburg Forest - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 03:32 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,054,795 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildWestDude View Post
there was not Germany then. In general it was said that the western Roman empire (Rome) fell to the "barbarians"/Visigoths or just Goths from the north. The eastern Roman empire (Constantinople) fell much later to the Turks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
perhaps not in the modern sense but all historians agree who they were in most common geographic terms
germany
I think that by lumping the Goths in with all Germanic people is just plain lazy and add to a lot of confusion once one gets past the 6th grade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
7,541 posts, read 10,261,826 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
perhaps not in the modern sense but all historians agree who they were in most common geographic terms
germany


Battle of the Teutoburg Forest - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Teutoburg Forest was a major battle in the 1st Century that Rome lost. The empire in the west didn't fall until the 5th Century.


Rome fell because too many barbarians crossed their border from the north with impunity.


The RE was where people wanted to live back in the 5th Century, they had indoor plumbing, running water, stadiums, bathhouses, various forms of recreation. A much more refined way of living than hunting and gathering, and living in a hut where you had to fetch your own water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 04:35 PM
 
Location: In a chartreuse microbus
3,863 posts, read 6,297,532 times
Reputation: 8107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
perhaps not in the modern sense but all historians agree who they were in most common geographic terms
germany


Battle of the Teutoburg Forest - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I just watched this on an episode of Ancient Assassins on the AHC channel. Interesting stuff!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 07:01 PM
 
4,660 posts, read 4,121,936 times
Reputation: 9012
The Ottoman Turks ended it by capturing Constantinople in 1453.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 07:31 PM
 
2,806 posts, read 3,178,992 times
Reputation: 2708
I think it is still too easy to blame the end of the Roman Empire on the invading Germanic tribes. The average tribe was maybe 50,000 people entering an empire of 60 million people. After AD 300 the empire had become so corrupt, dysfunctional and torn by internal civil wars that its defensive capacity had diminished greatly, along with the living standard of its people. To quote from the Old Testament: a giant on feet of clay. At that point a threat that was laughable in earlier times sufficed to break it.
I grew up on the Germanic border of the empire along the Rhine river in Germany. The Roman towns excavated there showed enormously impressive engineering feats: the theaters, the sanitary systems, the aqueducts, the roads, the cement that cured even under water and allowed to build harbors, lots of trade goods from all Mediterranean areas were found etc. Between 300-400 AD the towns were either destroyed or abandoned and subsequently the people returned to living in huts and a mere local subsistence economy. Quite a change!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2014, 11:01 PM
 
2,269 posts, read 3,801,854 times
Reputation: 2133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Potential_Landlord View Post
Between 300-400 AD the towns were either destroyed or abandoned and subsequently the people returned to living in huts and a mere local subsistence economy. Quite a change!
This is something to remember when people criticize third world countries for struggling after the end of colonialism. We are all aware of the many great accomplishments of the countries of northwest, and central Europe over the last half millennium. However, it's good to keep in mind how far these places fell after Rome left, and that it took 1,000 years for them to begin to approach the standard of living that the Romans had achieved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top