Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-26-2015, 04:30 PM
 
19,015 posts, read 27,574,271 times
Reputation: 20265

Advertisements

No, not the one from popular video game.
Come to find, back in 1948, Kotin's construction bureau designed a tank, equipped with dual Tesla coils. Tank was fully electrical, as in - propelled by electrical motors. Power supply was a portable - yes - nuclear reactor designed by Kurchatov's bureau. Power output was 0.9 MWt.
Dual Tesla coils created a channel of ionized air reaching out up to 4.5 km, with several thousand amperes of striking force.
Entire idea was to fry opponent tank electrical everything and then simply pick it up, replace electronics, and possibly reuse.
Believe it or not, probing grounds real tank tests were done 1951 through 1954 and then, for reason unknown to anyone, tank was dismantled and idea abandoned upon Khrushchev personal order.

That's what it looked like in real life:

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-26-2015, 04:44 PM
 
Location: Sugarmill Woods , FL
6,234 posts, read 8,438,954 times
Reputation: 13809
Very interesting, wonder what the testing results were?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2015, 06:22 PM
 
Location: Caverns measureless to man...
7,588 posts, read 6,624,774 times
Reputation: 17966
It looks awfully small. I'm sure it used very little electricity, but it doesn't look as though it could do much damage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2015, 02:17 PM
 
19,015 posts, read 27,574,271 times
Reputation: 20265
It's Kotin's bureau. Modified T34. That's why it looks kinda small. I think I figured why Khrushchev shut it down though. Man was obsessed with rockets and did not believe into anything else.
But what is amazing is not even the coil guns. Germans had those on their Ananerde flying saucers. Amazing is that at that time, they already had a working small nuclear reactor.
I think if they said 4.5 striking range - that must have been quite impressive.
Mr K. also shut down several very promising and futuristic projects, once again, because it was rockets or bust.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2015, 02:18 PM
 
19,015 posts, read 27,574,271 times
Reputation: 20265
Just to clarify - Josef Kotin was the T-34 people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,865 posts, read 26,492,827 times
Reputation: 25764
One way to recycle a T-34-85. Though the original looks better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2015, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Southeast Michigan
2,851 posts, read 2,299,763 times
Reputation: 4546
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukrkoz View Post
It's Kotin's bureau. Modified T34. That's why it looks kinda small. I think I figured why Khrushchev shut it down though. Man was obsessed with rockets and did not believe into anything else.
But what is amazing is not even the coil guns. Germans had those on their Ananerde flying saucers. Amazing is that at that time, they already had a working small nuclear reactor.
I think if they said 4.5 striking range - that must have been quite impressive.
Mr K. also shut down several very promising and futuristic projects, once again, because it was rockets or bust.
They "claim" they had the working reactor.

Given the sheer number of problems they had with their submarine nuclear reactors well into the 1960s - even without considering the accidents, they were very finicky, leaky and dangerous to the crews during normal operation - I very much doubt they would have a working tank reactor in 1948. Looks more like a far-shot concept.

Btw, there was no "electronics" to fry in a WW2 era tank. Perhaps the radios. The diesel powered tanks didn't even need a spark once they were going, and to the best of my knowledge the turret rotation mechanisms were mostly hydraulic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2015, 08:17 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,192,216 times
Reputation: 7693
Boy the tank posted in the OP sure looks like the tesla tanks that we had in the game Red Alert 2....

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2015, 08:24 PM
 
78,348 posts, read 60,547,237 times
Reputation: 49635
Sorry but I'm thinking this was a concept weapon that they couldn't get off the ground.

It gets put into a video game and so on and so forth.

Unless somebody can pony up some old footage of one shooting out energy beams.....I'm going to be skeptical to say the least.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top