Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-27-2016, 07:10 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,304,388 times
Reputation: 2172

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumbdowndemocrats View Post
1.The Japanese failed to destroy the dry docks and fuel depot
They didn't plan to do this because they could do this.
Quote:
2.They should of drawed out the US battleships to deeper water to ensure that they would never float and be used against them again.The Battle of Leyte Gulf the Japanese encounter the surviving Pearl Harbor battleships and deemed them ghost ships...scared the s#!t out of them.
"Please come out where we can deep six your ass." Yeah, that's a plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-27-2016, 07:17 PM
 
5,756 posts, read 3,998,245 times
Reputation: 2308
www.pacificaviationmuseum.org/pearl-harbor-blo leyte gulf revenge
Sorry it won't load up but it tells how Adm.Jesse Oldendorf crossed the Japanese T allowing full broadsides plus other goodies...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2016, 07:24 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,304,388 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumbdowndemocrats View Post
www.pacificaviationmuseum.org/pearl-harbor-blo leyte gulf revenge
Sorry it won't load up but it tells how Adm.Jesse Oldendorf crossed the Japanese T allowing full broadsides plus other goodies...
Yeah, we heard about that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2016, 08:21 PM
 
Location: New Mexico
4,796 posts, read 2,801,052 times
Reputation: 4926
Default Pearl was a raid, & only a raid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumbdowndemocrats View Post
1.The Japanese failed to destroy the dry docks and fuel depot
2.They should of drawed out the US battleships to deeper water to ensure that they would never float and be used against them again.The Battle of Leyte Gulf the Japanese encounter the surviving Pearl Harbor battleships and deemed them ghost ships...scared the s#!t out of them.
Yah, the IJN Pearl Harbor strike force didn't have time (nor fuel) to hang around. Yes, the plan to sink capital ships @ anchor, in shallow water, shoot up the crews, give the engineers & mechanics & divers & everybody else a real hate for Japan - that was a plan that needed a serious rethink. The ships that were salvageable were up & either returned to duty, or ferried to California for more extensive repairs & refitting - & improvement - once the ship is out for a while, you may as while upgrade the systems.


IJN only sent fast aircraft carriers & fast escorts - because they wanted to be able to flee, if necessary. The uncertainty about being spotted by air, by USN subs, or by the missing US aircraft carriers, worried the strike force. They flew two waves, recovered their aircraft, & retreated back to Japanese controlled sea-lanes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 05:40 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,304,388 times
Reputation: 2172
There were battleships with the Nagumo Kido Butai, the 3rd Battleship Division (less Section 2).

The Japanese had hoped that the Fleet would be at anchor off the west coast of the Big Island, but scouts reported that empty. (A formality, really, as Yoshikawa had already reported Pearl as being full, as usual for a weekend.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 09:39 AM
 
5,756 posts, read 3,998,245 times
Reputation: 2308
Quote:
Originally Posted by southwest88 View Post
Yah, the IJN Pearl Harbor strike force didn't have time (nor fuel) to hang around. Yes, the plan to sink capital ships @ anchor, in shallow water, shoot up the crews, give the engineers & mechanics & divers & everybody else a real hate for Japan - that was a plan that needed a serious rethink. The ships that were salvageable were up & either returned to duty, or ferried to California for more extensive repairs & refitting - & improvement - once the ship is out for a while, you may as while upgrade the systems.


IJN only sent fast aircraft carriers & fast escorts - because they wanted to be able to flee, if necessary. The uncertainty about being spotted by air, by USN subs, or by the missing US aircraft carriers, worried the strike force. They flew two waves, recovered their aircraft, & retreated back to Japanese controlled sea-lanes.
The Japanese thought we would just give up but Yamamoto warned that he would run amok across the Pacific for 6 months then he said he couldn't delivery victory if the war lasted beyond that and he was right.They indeed woke a sleeping giant.
You are right about the refitting the problem was you were never going to get these old BB to go faster than 20 knots they were not suited for fast carrier groups as the Iowa class was.
The Japanese navy was a first rate outfit Yamamoto blamed hot heads in the army for their rush to war against us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 09:56 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,304,388 times
Reputation: 2172
The "sleeping giant" quote was first heard in "Tora, Tora, Tora." No record of it before that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 09:57 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,304,388 times
Reputation: 2172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumbdowndemocrats View Post
You are right about the refitting the problem was you were never going to get these old BB to go faster than 20 knots they were not suited for fast carrier groups as the Iowa class was.
The fact that the new BBs were being built to keep up with the carriers should close the book on that debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,717 posts, read 18,925,997 times
Reputation: 11226
Rather than write a long thread, I'll post a link to the History.net article as to why the attack was such a blunder on the part of the Japanese. The article is titled The Pearl Harbor Myth and you might have to scroll down to read it. In basics, the Japanese failed at Pearl Harbor. The goal was to put the US carrier fleet out of action. Obviously they failed as the carriers were not there. So now the attacking planes had the wrong ordinance for taking out battleships that explosive bombs would pretty much just bounce off of them. There was also confusion on the part of the Japanese at the beginning of the attack. The pilots were confused on what targets to go after since the carriers were not there. The Japanese did not have radios in the planes. And the leader of the Japanese air armada just sat and watched his planes screw it all up.

Read the article. It brings new light to an often misunderstood event. While the attack did set the US fleet back, the damage could have been several times more and the desired effect could have been achieved but once you see the numbers, it was a dismal blunder.
Pearl Harbor | HistoryNet
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2016, 10:17 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
3,287 posts, read 2,304,388 times
Reputation: 2172
I recommend Zimm's book highly! First new work I've seen on Pearl in a couple of decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top