Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2014, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Connectucut shore but on a hill
2,619 posts, read 7,027,576 times
Reputation: 3344

Advertisements

I'm now doing some substantial remodeling. In the course of the projects a number of junction boxes were found hidden behind the sheetrock. I know that current code doesn't allow reconciled junction boxes at all.

The house is middle-aged, some parts date from the 50's and 60's. There were 2 major additions - an 880 sq ft addition and later a second floor after a fire. These additions were both were properly permitted and inspected at the time. It's apparent that there were also several smaller remodels over the years (repartitioning rooms, adding ceiling lights, adding a bathroom, etc). It seems that these were not permitted and inspected. FWIW, this situation is extremely common in the area. Many houses are much, much older and have had ongoing and undocumented changes for 150+ years. Anyway, here are my questions:
  • Were concealed junction boxes ever allowed by code?
  • If so, how ago was that?
  • Is it acceptable to have a hidden junction box behind an access panel? If not please explain.
Any helpful comments welcome. Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2014, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,625 posts, read 12,287,540 times
Reputation: 5233
#1 No
#2 Not applicable
#3 yes, as long as it is accessible
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Morrisville, NC
9,144 posts, read 14,753,437 times
Reputation: 9070
MrWillys is right.

Now, I am really not trying to be a pain, but seems like a few of your posts have dealt with wanting to do things in a way that is not the "right" way and when people pointed that out, you got upset. This exact situation is just a logical extension of previous owners of your house not doing little things the right way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Connectucut shore but on a hill
2,619 posts, read 7,027,576 times
Reputation: 3344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherifftruman View Post
MrWillys is right.

Now, I am really not trying to be a pain, but seems like a few of your posts have dealt with wanting to do things in a way that is not the "right" way and when people pointed that out, you got upset. This exact situation is just a logical extension of previous owners of your house not doing little things the right way.
Look, what I object to is lectures or somebody not actually answering the question at hand. I want to know the pros/cons so I can evaluate the downside vs the convenience. There's a big difference between a wiring shortcut and installing sheetrock backwards. I'd point out that lots of the responses to those posts weren't even remotely informative, more along the lines of "because that's the wrong way." That's a lazy, cop-out response. And it seemed like in several cases those posters didn't even know what it was about the right way that made the wrong way wrong. Everything has a reason and everything has pros and cons. I like to know what they are.

Last edited by Ultrarunner; 02-27-2014 at 12:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 03:59 PM
PDD
 
Location: The Sand Hills of NC
8,773 posts, read 18,379,327 times
Reputation: 12004
Splices that are buried behind walls are illegal but there are plenty of electricians and homeowners that think because they are careful "what could possibly happen"?

It's your home do what you want but I would make the splices accessible via a j box with a surface cover.

Mr Willys is correct
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Connectucut shore but on a hill
2,619 posts, read 7,027,576 times
Reputation: 3344
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWillys View Post
#1 No
#2 Not applicable
#3 yes, as long as it is accessible
Thank you sir, that's all I need to know!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2014, 06:42 PM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,503,954 times
Reputation: 35437
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWillys View Post
#1 No
#2 Not applicable
#3 yes, as long as it is accessible


This^^^
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2014, 05:30 PM
 
2,994 posts, read 5,586,616 times
Reputation: 4690
There is a splice kit made by TYCO approved by the NEC for concealed splices. It is UL listed.

I dont use them and never recommend them to my customers because I think it's hack. It is legal by the NEC though.


334.40 Boxes and Fittings. (B) Devices of Insulating Material. Switch, outlet, and tap devices of insulating material shall be permitted to be used without boxes in exposed cable wiring and for rewiring in existing buildings where the cable is concealed and fished.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2014, 05:19 AM
 
110 posts, read 609,391 times
Reputation: 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by kletter1mann View Post
I'm now doing some substantial remodeling. In the course of the projects a number of junction boxes were found hidden behind the sheetrock. I know that current code doesn't allow reconciled junction boxes at all.

The house is middle-aged, some parts date from the 50's and 60's. There were 2 major additions - an 880 sq ft addition and later a second floor after a fire. These additions were both were properly permitted and inspected at the time. It's apparent that there were also several smaller remodels over the years (repartitioning rooms, adding ceiling lights, adding a bathroom, etc). It seems that these were not permitted and inspected. FWIW, this situation is extremely common in the area. Many houses are much, much older and have had ongoing and undocumented changes for 150+ years. Anyway, here are my questions:
  • Were concealed junction boxes ever allowed by code?
  • If so, how ago was that?
  • Is it acceptable to have a hidden junction box behind an access panel? If not please explain.
Any helpful comments welcome. Thanks.
I went through the same thing. Concealing junction boxes, like others have stated has never been allowed. During my refinish/remodel (had to remove some of the old sheet rock since my old cabinets basically ripped it off), I simply left the junction boxes accessible and put a removable cover piece over them. It's the legal way to do things even if it's not the most attractive to have a blank cover plate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2014, 08:38 AM
 
43,011 posts, read 108,004,288 times
Reputation: 30721
I know it wasn't permitted 20 years ago. When we ran more electric to our third floor, they put a junction box in the ceiling at the attic stairwell landing. That small space has ceiling panels instead of drywall. I complained because I hate how it looks, and my husband told me it was required because of the junction box. It turns out we never look up when we're at the landing so it's not a big deal. If it was in an area that needed drywall for aesthetics, I'd cover it with a small plastic panel or vent or something that isn't too out of place for the spot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top