Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 11-03-2014, 10:10 PM
 
67 posts, read 92,654 times
Reputation: 99

Advertisements

Refinancing the home we bought in 2011. Lender required a current test of the well water, and test turned up arsenic at a level higher than the EPA max limit. So we'll need to have a filtration system installed.

When we bought the place, the well water had been recently tested for e. Coli (and passed that test) but apparently not for anything else. We didn't know that there were other things that should be tested for.

Should the Realtor have known that the water should be tested also for arsenic and other things? Apparently arsenic in well water is not uncommon in the general area where we bought.

Also, in checking this out via the paperwork we received at closing and then doing some digging online, apparently we should have received a "Domestic Well/Water Seller's Property Disclosure Statement" within 5 days of closing, and we did not receive one. In all the things that needed to be done at closing and right after, we never noticed that we were supposed to receive this paperwork and didn't.

So ???
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-04-2014, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Johns Creek, GA
17,472 posts, read 66,002,677 times
Reputation: 23621
So, at this point you're SOL!

Get the filter, and live happily ever after...
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2014, 10:20 AM
 
23,589 posts, read 70,358,767 times
Reputation: 49216
I would contact the board of realtors, suggest that I was interested in buying a new home but concerned about arsenic in the water, and ask what the requirements for reporting were. Depending on the response, I would pursue it from there or not.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2014, 10:35 AM
 
Location: southwestern PA
22,566 posts, read 47,614,734 times
Reputation: 48163
How much arsenic is present?
And how will you prove that the arsenic was present before 2011?
Maybe it is recent.

http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesr...enic/index.cfm
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2014, 10:53 AM
 
67 posts, read 92,654 times
Reputation: 99
@Pitt Chick: Re how much arsenic is present ... the EPA max allowable is .010 parts per million -- our water tested at .0451 parts per million. I don't know that we could prove the arsenic was present before 2011, but I think it's reasonable to assume that it was, because now that I'm looking into it I am finding that arsenic in well water is not uncommon for the area, and it apparently leaches out of the natural soil.

@harry chickpea: That's a good idea, contacting the board of realtors. I'll do that!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2014, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Central Florida
3,262 posts, read 4,997,171 times
Reputation: 15027
One more thing to consider: When you check with the board of realtors about the reporting requirements for arsenic in water, remember that the reporting requirements today may be different from the reporting requirements when you bought the house.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2014, 01:14 PM
 
524 posts, read 574,191 times
Reputation: 1093
I am confused as to why you think the sellers knew. You didn't know for years, until someone required you test the water. I doubt you have any type of disclosure case.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2014, 02:22 PM
 
67 posts, read 92,654 times
Reputation: 99
@Pooks1976 -- I am not sure what the sellers knew, but since arsenic in well water is apparently an issue throughout that particular county (as I just have found out), it seems to me that the realtor should have known it was a strong possibility and should have required the seller to have the water tested for that and a fix done if the arsenic showed up. I don't know if this is something the realtor should have done or not, that's why I'm asking.

@WellShoneMoon -- Yep, I agree that the reporting requirements now may be different than when we bought the home.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2014, 02:25 PM
 
Location: southwestern PA
22,566 posts, read 47,614,734 times
Reputation: 48163
Maybe it was not required as it is a known issue already???
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2014, 03:17 PM
 
Location: Back at home in western Washington!
1,490 posts, read 4,754,096 times
Reputation: 3244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quailin View Post
@Pooks1976 -- I am not sure what the sellers knew, but since arsenic in well water is apparently an issue throughout that particular county (as I just have found out), it seems to me that the realtor should have known it was a strong possibility and should have required the seller to have the water tested for that and a fix done if the arsenic showed up. I don't know if this is something the realtor should have done or not, that's why I'm asking.

@WellShoneMoon -- Yep, I agree that the reporting requirements now may be different than when we bought the home.
A realtor with a very strong set of personal morals might have...an average realtor (particularly a seller's realtor) is going to follow the laws and requirements. If the E. Coli test was the only one needed, that would be the only one done. There is a certain amount of "buyer beware" when buying anything.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top