Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you favor building elevated lanes along the West Loop 610 ?
Yes 19 63.33%
No 7 23.33%
Undecided 4 13.33%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-17-2015, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Northwest Houston
6,292 posts, read 7,505,541 times
Reputation: 5061

Advertisements

A proposal for elevated lanes along Loop 610 West offers hope to motorists weary of fighting some of the state's worst congestion, but concerns about environmental impacts linger.

The Texas Department of Transportation last week offered the public a glimpse of the plan, which calls for two elevated lanes in each direction from Interstate 10 to U.S. 59. The lanes might be tolled.





Elevated lanes raise hopes for Loop 610 relief - Houston Chronicle
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-17-2015, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Upper Kirby, Houston, TX
1,347 posts, read 1,822,443 times
Reputation: 1018
No, I don't like the current design. The biggest influx of traffic is those coming from 59 to 610 or vica versa, yet none of those drivers will be able to utilize the express lanes. In addition to that if I'm not mistaken, they're gonna add entrance and exit ramps on 610 in between the 290 interchange and I-10 interchange? Sounds like the bottleneck right there is about to get a lot worse. If endless money existed I would say double deck this portion of 610 but it won't haopen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2015, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Memorial Villages
1,514 posts, read 1,795,280 times
Reputation: 1697
These lanes do NOT go from Hwy 59 to I-10 - in fact, they have access to neither. As planned, seems like a lot of money for limited benefit.

Autonomobiles cannot get here quickly enough...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2015, 12:41 PM
 
5,976 posts, read 15,277,243 times
Reputation: 6711
Default Yes...

I say yes, it is not like it is going through a neighborhood of family homes. Plus, the top will be an express, people will zip by the Galleria in less than a few minutes. They most likely will construct it to mitigate the noise, but again, it is not like there is a backyard with a swing set every inch of the way. Something has to be done, better do it now, it will never get cheaper in the future, a lesson we've learned already when rail was proposed 30+ years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2015, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX (Bellaire)
4,900 posts, read 13,740,597 times
Reputation: 4191
Sounds good in theory but look how it turned out on I-35 in Austin
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2015, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Houston/Brenham
5,819 posts, read 7,237,559 times
Reputation: 12317
Yes, do it.

The problem is they are only going to add TWO lanes (in each direction). Not nearly enough added lanes. Six months later, they'll be discussing how to add more lanes to it.

Just make it 4 in each direction and be done with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2015, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Upper Kirby, Houston, TX
1,347 posts, read 1,822,443 times
Reputation: 1018
Quote:
Originally Posted by astrohip View Post
Yes, do it.

The problem is they are only going to add TWO lanes (in each direction). Not nearly enough added lanes. Six months later, they'll be discussing how to add more lanes to it.

Just make it 4 in each direction and be done with it.
Right, it needs to be fully double decked from 59 to I-10.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2015, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Texas
5,847 posts, read 6,191,336 times
Reputation: 12327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Lance View Post
The lanes might be tolled.
I bet they wouldn't do that, would they?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2015, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Katy, Texas
498 posts, read 838,016 times
Reputation: 648
We need direct expressways all over this metro, elevated or not: I-10 west, I-45 north and south, US-59 south, and especially some solution that would allow traffic using 610 west loop as a connector to pass through without having to slowing for entering/exiting vehicles.

I don't think they would benefit 288 however. I hardly ever see anyone exiting 610 when headed downtown. It just needs to be expanded and the Beltway 8 intersection sorely needs its own flyovers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2015, 01:58 PM
ptt
 
497 posts, read 637,658 times
Reputation: 692
What we need is sky train system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top