Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-11-2023, 04:09 AM
 
Location: Tricity, PL
61,766 posts, read 87,217,162 times
Reputation: 131773

Advertisements

Nearly six years after Hurricane Harvey, more than $1 billion have been spent on a voter-approved bond to mitigate flooding, but without a significant rainfall event in more than two years, it's unclear if the projects will make a difference.
Harris County has until 2026 to spend Harvey relief funds.
Voters approved: $5 billion in flood mitigation projects.
The county's latest update from five months ago shows it still needs to secure more than a billion dollars in other sources.
The money is going toward about 180 projects. So far, only 25 have been completed, with just six in the past two years.

https://abc13.com/amp/houston-floodi...gate/13231723/

In that tempo, they will never finish those 180 projects till 2026.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-11-2023, 06:39 AM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,907 posts, read 6,617,073 times
Reputation: 6436
what’s this? “Let’s not build any infrastructure because we don’t know when a major rain event will come”? You’d prefer pause all current projects out of “uncertainty”?

And I simply disagree. A Harvey type event is rare and even with the best infrastructure in the world, it won’t mitigate everything. With the rain events that have taken place, the difference has proven.

The bigger issue is that they aren’t everywhere and some neighborhoods are being less prioritized than others. Another routine fear porn post from the same OP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
332 posts, read 261,659 times
Reputation: 464
What a garbage article.

We've had a couple good years without a hurricane and/or major flood and people are complaining because they want to see how our new infrastructure handles it? Make no mistake - that time will come. If anything a hiatus in calamitous weather is the perfect opportunity to develop our flood mitigation measures. Pausing work would be a huge mistake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 07:18 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
839 posts, read 457,523 times
Reputation: 1317
Awful article. Building speculation on flood control investments because there hasn’t been a large event to test it??? Are they asking for a major flood so they can say “see it’s not working.” This is garbage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Memorial Villages
1,514 posts, read 1,795,988 times
Reputation: 1697
If the HEC-RAS models show that the projects mitigate flooding, that's good enough for me...I'm in no hurry to see them tested with a major event.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 09:25 AM
 
18,132 posts, read 25,304,323 times
Reputation: 16846
Goes to show how easy it is to criticize government projects

I have no idea whether or not they are going to work ... but dmn, at least I see machine improving the bayous to reduce flooding.
Is this person against that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Houston
5,616 posts, read 4,949,389 times
Reputation: 4553
The Sims Bayou work doesn't get highlighted enough for how it has reduced flooding, and it was mostly completed before Harvey, so there's actual empirical evidence of the benefit. If it was more widely publicized, the silly sentiments voiced in such articles might mute themselves a bit.

Not that I'm trying to discourage scrutiny of government projects, but proper perspective is needed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2023, 03:52 PM
bu2
 
24,109 posts, read 14,903,765 times
Reputation: 12957
Quote:
Originally Posted by LocalPlanner View Post
The Sims Bayou work doesn't get highlighted enough for how it has reduced flooding, and it was mostly completed before Harvey, so there's actual empirical evidence of the benefit. If it was more widely publicized, the silly sentiments voiced in such articles might mute themselves a bit.

Not that I'm trying to discourage scrutiny of government projects, but proper perspective is needed.
They've done a lot of Sims Bayou projects over the years. Flooding was really bad in the late 70s along Sims.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2023, 04:11 PM
 
3,170 posts, read 2,058,967 times
Reputation: 4913
Subjectively... It does seem that the flooding during one of our "normal" heavy rain events does seem a bit better around town than it did 10 or 15 years ago. Obviously we haven't had a Harvey-level event in recent years but those times where we get 5 or 6 inches in a day don't seem to cause as many problems as they used to. YMMV.

Definitely agree with the sentiment that not having a huge storm recently is certainly no excuse to slow these projects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2023, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,907 posts, read 6,617,073 times
Reputation: 6436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Clutch View Post
Subjectively... It does seem that the flooding during one of our "normal" heavy rain events does seem a bit better around town than it did 10 or 15 years ago. Obviously we haven't had a Harvey-level event in recent years but those times where we get 5 or 6 inches in a day don't seem to cause as many problems as they used to. YMMV.

Definitely agree with the sentiment that not having a huge storm recently is certainly no excuse to slow these projects.
Like I said in the Memorial bridge park, it’s very unlike Dopo to be against improving our public parks.

In this case, it’s very unlike our OP to be against improving our infrastructure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top