Quote:
Originally Posted by Swordfish
That doesn’t really answer my question of why the indigenous people are called Latinos or Latinas…
|
This type of labeling NEVER makes sense...that's why it sounds silly, because it IS silly..but it's a human trait to want to "label" others. This helps separate "us" from "them".
You may be confusing the term "Latino" with "Ladino", a term used in Guatemala for non-Indians.
But nevertheless, ALL attempts to label people eventually end up sounding silly and contradictory. Here in California, we may be the worst. In our University system, in admissions, we find that--
(1) An Italian-descended white from Argentina, a Black from Panama, an Indian from Bolivia, or a mestizo from Mexico are ALL "Hispanics"..but a person from Spain is NOT..He's a "white European"...
(2) An Italian-American isn't "Latino"--he's "white"
(3) A Mexican-American who speaks only English is "Hispanic"---but a Lithuanian-American with a degree in Spanish is an "Anglo"...
(4) A white born in Anchorage is not an "Alaska Native"---but an Aleut born in Seattle IS...
Labels are silly. Years ago I read of an elderly man here in LA who'd just graduated from High School at age 82. They ran an article on him. He was born in the Ukraine, (spoke Ukrainian), emigrated at age 17 with his brother to Argentina, where he'd married and raised a big family.(And, of course, became fluent in Spanish). At age 80, he'd come to California, and enrolled in an inner-city High School, about half black and half Hispanic. He was having difficulty learning English.
One student was quoted as noticing the "old Anglo dude" in the class....
EXCUSE ME? An old man ,born into the Ukrainian language, speaking Spanish most of his life, barely able to speak English...suddenly becomes an "Anglo"?
What exactly is an "anglo", anyway? (the newspaper, of course, never questioned the quote)..
Anyway, as I said, all attempt to assign labels eventually just look silly..